UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:

¨	Preliminary Proxy Statement	
 	 	
¨	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))	
 	 	
þ	Definitive Proxy Statement	
 	 	
¨	Definitive Additional Materials	
 	 	
¨	Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12	

 	 	 	 	 	
VERINT SYSTEMS INC.	
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)	
 	
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)	
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ	No fee required	
 	 	
¨	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11	

 	 	
(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:	

(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:	

(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):	

(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:	

(5)	Total fee paid:	

 	
 	 	
¨	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.	
 	 	
¨	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.	

 	
 	 	
(1)	Amount Previously Paid:	

(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:	

(3)	Filing Party:	

(4)	Date Filed:	

330 South Service Road
Melville, New York 11747

May 14, 2014

Dear Verint Systems Inc. Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Verint Systems Inc., which will be held on Thursday, June 26, 2014, at 11:00 A.M. Eastern Time at the Hilton Garden Inn, 1575 Round Swamp Road, Plainview, New York 11803.
All holders of record of Verint Systems Inc. common stock as of May 2, 2014 are entitled to vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting.
Attached is our Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and our Proxy Statement, which describe the business to be conducted at the meeting. Also enclosed is our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014 and your proxy card. We encourage you to read the Form 10-K, which includes information on our operations, products and services, as well as our audited financial statements.
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote. After reading the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, please promptly submit your proxy.  If you are the registered holder of your shares, then we invite you to utilize the convenience of Internet voting at the website indicated on the enclosed proxy card.  Alternatively, you can vote by telephone or complete, sign, date and promptly return via mail the enclosed proxy card. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a bank, broker, or other nominee, please follow the specific instructions you receive from your bank, broker, or other nominee to vote your shares.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your continued support of Verint.

 	Sincerely,	
 	 	
 	Dan Bodner	
 	President and Chief Executive Officer	

Verint Systems Inc.
330 South Service Road
Melville, New York 11747

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 26, 2014

The 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Verint Systems Inc. (“Verint”), a Delaware corporation, will be held on Thursday, June 26, 2014, at 11:00 A.M. Eastern Time at the Hilton Garden Inn, 1575 Round Swamp Road, Plainview, New York 11803 (the “2014 Annual Meeting”) for the following purposes:
 	 	
(1)	To elect members of the Verint board of directors to serve for the following year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;	
 	 	
(2)	To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Verint’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending January 31, 2015;	
 	 	
(3)	To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the accompanying proxy statement; and	
 	 	
(4)	To transact such other business as may properly come before the 2014 Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.	
The board of directors has fixed the close of business on May 2, 2014 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2014 Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder, for any purpose concerning the meeting, during normal business hours at our principal executive offices, located at 330 South Service Road, Melville, New York 11747, during the ten days preceding the 2014 Annual Meeting.

 	By Order of the Board of Directors,	
 	 	
 	Jonathan Kohl	
 	Corporate Secretary	

May 14, 2014

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. IF YOU ARE THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF YOUR SHARES, THEN YOU MAY VOTE YOUR SHARES ELECTRONICALLY VIA THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY SIGNING, DATING, AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE. IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES IN “STREET NAME” THROUGH A BANK, BROKER, OR OTHER NOMINEE, PLEASE FOLLOW THE SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS YOU RECEIVE FROM YOUR BANK, BROKER, OR OTHER NOMINEE TO VOTE YOUR SHARES.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 26, 2014:  THE PROXY MATERIALS, INCLUDING THE NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, THE PROXY STATEMENT AND THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2014, ARE AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET AT WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 	 	
 	Page	
 	 	
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING	1	
PROPOSAL NO. 1	5	
PROPOSAL NO. 2	7	
PROPOSAL NO. 3	8	
OTHER MATTERS	10	
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	11	
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS	15	
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	16	
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION	46	
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION	47	
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT	48	
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE	51	
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS	51	
AUDIT MATTERS	57	
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE	58	
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2015 ANNUAL MEETING	59	
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES	60	
ANNUAL REPORT	60	
APPENDIX A	61	
DIRECTIONS TO MEETING	62	
FORM OF PROXY CARD	63	

i

Verint Systems Inc.
330 South Service Road
Melville, New York 11747

PROXY STATEMENT
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of Verint's board of directors in connection with our Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2014 Annual Meeting”) to be held on Thursday, June 26, 2014, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time or any adjournment or postponement of this meeting. The 2014 Annual Meeting will be held at the Hilton Garden Inn, 1575 Round Swamp Road, Plainview, New York 11803. Directions to the 2014 Annual Meeting can be found at the back of this proxy statement. Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we have elected to provide electronic access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our record and beneficial stockholders. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or to request a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials electronically by email on an ongoing basis. We encourage you to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet in order to help reduce the costs and environmental impact of printing proxy materials. We intend to mail the Notice and make available via the Internet this proxy statement, the accompanying proxy card and our previously filed Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014 to each stockholder entitled to vote at our 2014 Annual Meeting on or about May 14, 2014.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING
Although we encourage you to read this proxy statement in its entirety, we include this question and answer section to provide some background information and brief answers to several questions you might have about the 2014 Annual Meeting.
Questions Relating to Proxy Materials
Q: Why am I receiving these materials?
A: The board of directors is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with its solicitation of your proxy to vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting because you were a holder of Verint Systems Inc. common stock as of the close of business on May 2, 2014 (the “Record Date”) and are entitled to vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 54,037,251 shares of our common stock outstanding. This proxy statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote on the proposals expected to be presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting.
Q: Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials this year instead of printed paper proxy materials?
A: We are permitted to furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014, to our stockholders by providing access to such documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. Most stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice, which was mailed to most of our stockholders, will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice. Any request to receive proxy materials by mail or email will remain in effect until you revoke it.

Q: Why did I receive printed paper proxy materials in the mail instead of a Notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?
A:  We are providing stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. If you would like to reduce the environmental impact and the costs incurred by us in mailing proxy materials, you may elect to receive all future proxy materials electronically via email or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions for voting using the Internet that are provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in future years. Alternatively, you can go to  https://enroll.icsdelivery.com/vrnt  and enroll for Internet delivery of annual meeting and proxy voting materials.

Q: What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice, proxy or voting instruction card?
A: It generally means that some of your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for all Notices, proxy and voting instruction cards you receive.
Questions Relating to Voting
Q: What are the proposals and the voting recommendations of the board of directors?
A: The board of directors recommends the following votes on each of the proposals:
 	 	
•	FOR each of the director nominees (Proposal No. 1);	
 	 	
•	FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Verint’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending January 31, 2015 (Proposal No. 2); and	
 	 	
•	FOR approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement (Proposal No. 3).	
Q: How many votes do I have?
A: Each share of common stock that you owned at the close of business on the Record Date is entitled to one vote. These shares include:
 	 	
•	shares held directly in your name as the “stockholder of record”; and	
 	 	
•	shares held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, bank, or other nominee in “street name”.	
Q: What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?
A: Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker, bank, or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
 	 	
•	Stockholder of Record: If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc., you are considered the stockholder of record, and the Notice is being sent directly to you by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote in person at the 2014 Annual Meeting.	
 	 	
•	Beneficial Owner: If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account, by a bank, or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and the Notice is being forwarded to you by your broker, bank, or their nominee. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to vote your shares as described below and are also invited to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting. Since you are not the stockholder of record, however, you may not vote these shares in person at the 2014 Annual Meeting without a legal proxy from the record holder (your broker, bank, or other nominee). You may vote shares beneficially held by you as set out in the voting instruction card you receive from your broker, bank, or other nominee.	
Q: How do I vote?
A: If you hold shares as the stockholder of record, you may come to the 2014 Annual Meeting and cast your vote there. However, if you are a beneficial owner and you wish to vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting, you must bring a valid photo ID and a legal proxy from the record holder of your shares (your broker, bank, or other nominee) indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on the Record Date.
You may also direct how your shares are voted without attending the annual meeting in one of the following ways:
 	 	
•	Internet. If you hold shares as the stockholder of record, you can submit a proxy over the Internet to vote those shares at the 2014 Annual Meeting by accessing the website shown on your proxy card and following the instructions provided. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, your broker, bank or other nominee may also permit you to provide instructions electronically over the Internet to direct how those shares are voted at the 2014 Annual Meeting. Please follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee on the voting instruction card.	
 	 	
•	Telephone. If you hold shares as the stockholder of record, you can submit a proxy over the telephone to vote those shares at the annual meeting by following the instructions provided in the Notice, or if you received a printed version of the proxy materials by mail, by following the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, your broker, bank or other nominee may also	

2

permit you to provide instructions by telephone to direct how those shares are voted at the 2014 Annual Meeting. Please follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee on the voting instruction card.
 	 	
•	Mail.You may submit a proxy or voting instructions by mail to vote your shares at the 2014 Annual Meeting. Please mark, date, sign and return the proxy card or voting instruction card enclosed with the proxy materials you received.	
Q: Can I vote my shares by filling out and returning the Notice?
A: No. The Notice identifies the items to be voted on at the 2014 Annual Meeting, but you cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to vote by Internet and how to request paper copies of the proxy materials. It is not the same as a proxy card from us or a voting instruction card from your broker, bank, or other nominee.
Q: Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?
A: Yes, if you are a stockholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the 2014 Annual Meeting by:
 	 	
•	notifying our Corporate Secretary in writing before the 2014 Annual Meeting that you have revoked your proxy;	
 	 	
•	signing and delivering a later dated proxy to our Corporate Secretary;	
 	 	
•	voting by using the Internet or the telephone (your latest Internet or telephone proxy is counted); or	
 	 	
•	voting in person at the 2014 Annual Meeting.	
Any such written notice or later dated proxy must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices before 11:59 p.m. on June 25, 2014, if you are notifying us in writing, or before the vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting, if you are attending the 2014 Annual Meeting in person.
If you are a beneficial owner, you may submit new voting instructions only by contacting your bank, broker, or other nominee.
Q: What will happen if I do not instruct my bank, broker, or other nominee how to vote?
A: If you are a beneficial owner and you do not instruct your bank, broker, or other nominee how to vote, your bank, broker, or other nominee may vote your shares at its discretion on routine matters but not on non-routine matters. The ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal No. 2) is the only routine matter being presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting. Thus, if you do not otherwise instruct your bank, broker, or other nominee, they may vote your shares “FOR” Proposal No. 2.
Conversely, all of the other proposals being presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting are non-routine matters, and banks, brokers, and other nominees cannot vote on these matters without instructions from the beneficial owner. Without your voting instructions on these matters, a “broker non-vote” will occur. Shares held by banks, brokers, or other nominees that do not have discretionary authority to vote uninstructed shares on non-routine matters are not counted or deemed to be present or represented for the purpose of determining whether stockholders have approved a particular matter, but will be counted in determining whether a quorum is present at the 2014 Annual Meeting. See “—Q: How are votes counted?” below for more information.
Q: Who are the proxies and what do they do?
A: The persons named as proxies in the proxy materials, Dan Bodner, our Chief Executive Officer, Douglas Robinson, our Chief Financial Officer, and Peter Fante, our Chief Legal Officer and Chief Compliance Officer, were designated by the board of directors to vote the shares of holders who are not able or not eligible to vote their shares in person at the 2014 annual meeting, based on valid proxies received by us.
Q: How are votes counted?
A: The shares represented by all valid proxies received will be voted in the manner specified on the proxies. If you are a stockholder of record and you sign, date, and return your proxy card without making specific choices, the persons named as proxies above will vote your shares in accordance with the recommendations of the board of directors. If you are a beneficial holder, your bank, broker, or other nominee must vote for you, and as noted above, if you do not provide specific voting instructions, your bank, broker, or other nominee will only be able to vote on your behalf on routine matters. As a result, you are urged to specify your voting instructions by marking the appropriate boxes on the enclosed proxy card or on your voting instruction card, as applicable.

3

Q: Will any other matters be voted on?
A: We are not aware of any other matters that will be brought before the stockholders for a vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting, your proxy will authorize your appointed proxies to vote for you on such matters using their discretion.
Q: How many shares must be present to hold the 2014 Annual Meeting?
A: Holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock as of the Record Date must be represented in person or by proxy at the 2014 Annual Meeting in order to conduct business. This is called a quorum. If you vote, your shares will be part of the quorum. Abstentions, “withhold” votes, and broker non-votes also will be counted in determining whether a quorum exists.
Q: What vote is required to approve each proposal?
A: So long as there is a quorum, the voting requirement for each of the proposals is as follows:
 	 	
•	Election of Directors - the election of directors will be made by a plurality of votes cast at the 2014 Annual Meeting. That means the seven nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected. This is not considered a routine matter and banks, brokers, or other nominees may not vote without instructions from the stockholder. Because directors need only be elected by a plurality of the vote, abstentions, broker non-votes, and withheld votes will not affect whether a particular nominee has received sufficient votes to be elected.	
 	 	
•	Ratification of independent registered public accountants - the proposal for the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Verint’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending January 31, 2015 will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. This is considered a routine matter on which banks, brokers, or other nominees may vote if no instructions are provided by the stockholder, however, abstentions will count as votes against the proposal.	
 	 	
•	Approval of the compensation of the named executive officers - the advisory vote regarding the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. This is not considered a routine matter and banks, brokers, or other nominees may not vote without instructions from the stockholder. Broker non-votes will not affect whether this proposal is approved, however, abstentions will count as votes against this proposal.	
Q: Where can I find the voting results of the meeting?
A: The preliminary voting results will be announced at the meeting. The final voting results will be reported in a current report on Form 8-K, which will be filed with the SEC within four business days after the meeting. If our final voting results are not available within four business days after the meeting, we will file a current report on Form 8-K reporting the preliminary voting results and subsequently file the final voting results in an amendment to the current report on Form 8-K within four business days after the final voting results are known to us.
Q: Who is paying the costs of soliciting these proxies?
A: The expense of this solicitation, including the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, proxy card and proxy statement, will be borne by us. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mails, some of our officers and regular employees, without extra remuneration, may solicit proxies personally, by telephone or otherwise. In addition, arrangements will be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy cards and proxy materials to their principals, and we may reimburse them for their expenses in forwarding these materials.
Q: What do I need to do to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting?
A: You are entitled to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner of our shares as of the close of business on May 2, 2014. You should be prepared to present photo identification for admittance. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker, bank or nominee, and you wish to attend the meeting, you should provide proof of beneficial ownership as of the Record Date, such as your most recent account statement prior to May 2, 2014, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee, or similar evidence of ownership. If you are not a stockholder of record, note that you will not be able to vote your shares at the meeting unless you have a proxy from your broker. If you do not provide photo identification or comply with the other procedures outlined above, you may not be admitted to the 2014 Annual Meeting.

4

PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
All of our directors are elected at each annual meeting to serve until their successors are duly elected and qualified or their earlier death, resignation, or removal. The board of directors has nominated the persons named below, each of whom is presently serving on our board of directors, for election as directors. As of the date of this proxy statement, the board of directors consists of seven directors and two vacancies. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named below.
Each of the nominees was recommended for reelection by the corporate governance & nominating committee and has been approved by the board of directors. Each of the nominees has consented to serve for the new term if elected. If any nominee becomes unavailable to serve for any reason before the election, which is not anticipated, your proxy authorizes us to vote for another person nominated by the board of directors. The election of directors will be made by a plurality of votes cast at the 2014 Annual Meeting. That means the seven nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected. This is not considered a routine matter and banks, brokers, or other nominees may not vote without instructions from the stockholder. Because directors need only be elected by a plurality of the vote, abstentions, broker non-votes, and withhold votes will not affect whether a particular nominee has received sufficient votes to be elected.
As described in detail below, our nominees have considerable professional and business experience. The recommendation of our board of directors is based on its carefully considered judgment that the experience, record, and qualifications of our nominees make them well qualified to serve on our board of directors. The board of directors believes that each of the nominees listed brings strong skills and extensive experience to the board of directors, giving the board of directors as a group the appropriate skills to exercise its oversight responsibilities.

Name	 	Age	 	Director Since	 	Position(s)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner	 	55	 	1994	 	President, Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Officer, and Director	
Victor DeMarines	 	77	 	2002	 	Chairman of the Board	
John Egan	 	56	 	2012	 	Director	
Larry Myers	 	75	 	2003	 	Director	
Richard Nottenburg	 	60	 	2013	 	Director	
Howard Safir	 	72	 	2002	 	Director	
Earl Shanks	 	57	 	2012	 	Director	
Dan Bodner serves as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Officer, and a director. Mr. Bodner has served as our President and/or Chief Executive Officer and as a director since 1994. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Bodner also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Comverse Government Systems Corp., a former affiliate of ours. Prior to such positions, from 1987 to 1991, Mr. Bodner held various management positions at Comverse Technology, Inc. The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Bodner’s position as our Chief Executive Officer, his intimate knowledge of our operations, assets, customers, growth strategies, and competitors, his knowledge of the technology, software, and security industries, and his extensive management experience give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Victor DeMarines has served as a director since 2002 and as Chairman of the Board since February 2013. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. DeMarines served as President and Chief Executive Officer of MITRE Corporation, a nonprofit organization, which provides security solutions for the computer systems of the Department of Defense, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, the Internal Revenue Service, and several organizations in the U.S. intelligence community. Mr. DeMarines also served as a director of MITRE Corporation from 2000 to 2010 and presently serves as a consultant to MITRE and on its Army Advisory Board. Mr. DeMarines also currently serves as a director of NetScout Systems, Inc., a provider of network performance solutions (“NetScout”). He serves on the NetScout audit and governance committees and is chairman of the NetScout finance committee. Mr. DeMarines also served as a Presidential Executive with the Department of Transportation. The board of directors has concluded that Mr. DeMarines’ financial and business expertise, including his diversified background of managing a security-based company, serving as a chief executive officer, and serving as a director of a public technology company, gives him the qualifications and skills to serve as Chairman of the Board.
John Egan has served as a director since August 2012. Mr. Egan has been a managing partner and general partner of Egan-Managed Capital, a venture capital firm, since 1998. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Egan served as the Executive Vice President, Products and Offerings of EMC Corporation (“EMC”) and from 1992 to 1996 he served as Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing of EMC. From 1986 to 1992, Mr. Egan held various executive roles with EMC, including Executive Vice President, Operations, and Executive Vice President, International Sales. Mr. Egan has served as a director of (i) EMC since 1992, where

5

he is currently the chairman of the mergers and acquisitions committee and a member of the finance committee, (ii) VMWare Inc. since 2007, where he is currently the chairman of the mergers and acquisitions committee, (iii) NetScout since 2001, where he is currently lead director, a member of the audit committee and a member of the nominating and governance committee, and (iv) Progress Software Corporation since 2011, where he is currently the non-executive chairman of the board and a member of the compensation committee. We believe Mr. Egan's financial and business expertise, including a diversified background of managing and serving as a director of several public technology companies and expertise in mergers and acquisitions, gives him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Larry Myers has served as a director since 2003. From 1991 to 1999, Mr. Myers served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of MITRE Corporation, a nonprofit organization that provides security solutions for the computer systems of the Department of Defense, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, the Internal Revenue Service, and several organizations in the U.S. intelligence community. Prior to that, Mr. Myers served as Controller for Fairchild Industries, Inc. The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Myers’ financial and business expertise, including his background of managing a security-based company, and his deep financial expertise in serving as a chief financial officer, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Richard Nottenburg hasserved as a director since February 2013, having previously served as a director of Verint from July 2011 to November 2011. Dr. Nottenburg, an investor in early stage technology companies and a business consultant, served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of Sonus Networks, Inc. from 2008 through 2010. From 2004 until 2008, Dr. Nottenburg was an officer with Motorola, Inc., ultimately serving as its Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and Chief Technology Officer. Dr. Nottenburg is currently a member of the boards of directors of PMC Sierra, Inc. (where he is also a member of the audit committee), Aeroflex Corporation, and Violin Memory Inc. (where he is also a member of the compensation committee and the corporate governance and nominating committee). He was a member of the board of directors of Comverse Technology, Inc. from 2006 to 2011. The board of directors has concluded that Dr. Nottenburg's financial and business expertise, including his diversified background of managing technology companies, serving as a chief executive officer, and serving as a director of public technology companies, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Howard Safir has served as a director since 2002. Since 2010, Mr. Safir has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of VRI Technologies LLC, a security consulting and law enforcement integrator. From 2001 until 2010, Mr. Safir served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SafirRosetti, a provider of security and investigation services and a wholly owned subsidiary of Global Options Group Inc. Mr. Safir served as the Vice Chairman of Global Options Group Inc. from its 2005 acquisition of SafirRosetti until 2010. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Bode Technology, also a wholly owned subsidiary of Global Options Group Inc., from 2007 to 2010. Mr. Safir currently serves as a director of Implant Sciences Corporation, an explosives device detection company, and LexisNexis Special Services, Inc., a leading provider of information and technology solutions to governments. During his career, Mr. Safir served as the 39th Police Commissioner of the City of New York, as Associate Director for Operations, U.S. Marshals Service, and as Assistant Director of the Drug Enforcement Administration. Mr. Safir was awarded the Ellis Island Medal of Honor among other citations and awards. The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Safir’s extensive law enforcement background and his financial and business expertise, including a diversified background of managing and serving as a director of public technology and security-based companies and serving as a chief executive officer, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Earl Shanks has served as a director since July 2012.  Mr. Shanks served as the Chief Financial Officer at Convergys Corporation, a global leader in relationship management solutions and a major provider of outsourced business services from 2003 until 2012.  From 1996 to 2003, Mr. Shanks held various financial leadership roles with NCR Corporation, ultimately serving as the Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2003 where he oversaw treasury, finance, real estate, tax, and six business unit finance teams.  Mr. Shanks also served as chairman of the board of directors of NCR Japan, a publicly traded corporation, from 1998 to 2001.  From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Shanks served as the Vice President and Treasurer of Farley Industries, a private equity firm, and Fruit of the Loom Inc., an apparel manufacturer.  From 1983 to 1991, he served in various tax leadership roles at Farley Industries and Fruit of the Loom Inc. The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Shanks’ financial and business expertise, including his deep financial expertise serving as a chief financial officer of a public company, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
For stockholders of record, if no voting specification is made on a properly returned or voted proxy card, the person or persons voting your shares pursuant to instructions by proxy card will vote FOR this proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

6

PROPOSAL NO. 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The audit committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to act as Verint’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending January 31, 2015. The audit committee has directed that such appointment be submitted to our stockholders for ratification at the 2014 Annual Meeting. Deloitte & Touche LLP was Verint’s firm of independent registered public accountants for the year ended January 31, 2014.
Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Verint’s independent registered public accountants is not required. The audit committee, however, is submitting the appointment to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the audit committee will reconsider whether or not to retain Deloitte & Touche LLP or another firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the audit committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different accounting firm at any time during the year ending January 31, 2015 if the audit committee determines that such a change would be in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the 2014 Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire. They will also be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The proposal for the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Verint’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending January 31, 2015 will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. This is considered a routine matter on which banks, brokers, or other nominees may vote if no instructions are provided by the stockholder, however, abstentions will count as votes against the proposal.
For stockholders of record, if no voting specification is made on a properly returned or voted proxy card, the person or persons voting your shares pursuant to instructions by proxy card will vote FOR this proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" PROPOSAL NO. 2.

7

PROPOSAL NO. 3
ADVISORY VOTE ON APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF
THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
At our annual meeting of stockholders held on June 16, 2011, our stockholders approved the recommendation of the board of directors that future stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation should occur once every three years (approved by over 75% of the votes cast) ("say-on-frequency vote"). As a result of this vote and as required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enacted in July 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our stockholders are entitled to vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. Notwithstanding the result of our last say-on-frequency vote, however, we expect to hold "say-on-pay" votes annually in the future.

Although this say-on-pay vote is an advisory vote only and is not binding on Verint or the board of directors, the compensation committee and the board of directors value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions. In our last say-on-pay vote at our annual meeting of stockholders on June 16, 2011, our stockholders approved the recommendation of the board of directors that the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the associated May 2011 proxy statement should be approved (approved by over 85% of the votes cast).

As described more fully in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain the best talent to lead the company by providing incentives to our named executive officers to achieve outstanding performance results, to outperform our direct competitors, and to optimize stockholder value. To support this philosophy, we set target compensation in a range around median and structure our compensation arrangements so that actual pay outcomes will vary (above or below target) based on the performance achieved. The program seeks to align executive compensation with stockholder value on an annual and long-term basis as follows:
 	 	
•	Executive pay consists of a mix of base pay, annual bonus, and long-term equity-based incentives;	

•	Annual bonuses are based on revenue, profitability, cash flow and individual objectives, are subject to a minimum threshold level of performance below which no payout is earned, and are limited to a specified maximum payout, which for the year ended January 31, 2014 was 150% of target;	

•	Long-term incentive awards are comprised of a combination of time-based and performance-based restricted stock units, which are designed to link executive compensation with increased stockholder value over time, with the performance-based awards subject to a minimum threshold level of performance below which no payout is earned and a specified maximum payout, which for the year ended January 31, 2014 was 125% of target; and	

•	A significant majority of the total direct compensation of each named executive officer is at-risk or is paid in equity (whose value depends on our stock price), specifically, approximately 90% for our Chief Executive Officer and approximately 80% on average for the other named executive officers (calculated based on the value of equity (both time-based and performance-based) plus performance-based bonuses received in the year ended January 31, 2014, as a function of total compensation). Performance-based equity and performance-based bonuses alone accounted for approximately 55% of our Chief Executive Officer’s total direct compensation and approximately 50% of the total direct compensation of each of our other named executive officers.	

8

We also have several governance programs in place to align executive compensation with stockholder interests and mitigate risks in our compensation plans. These programs include:
 	 	
•	a clawback policy;	
 	 	
•	stock ownership guidelines;	
 	 	
•	limited perquisites;	
 	 	
•	use of tally sheets;	
 	 	
•	a policy prohibiting hedging or significant pledging in our securities by our officers and directors; and	
 	 	
•	a policy precluding us from entering into any new plan, program, agreement, or arrangement providing for a 280G tax gross-up payment with any person or, subject to a limited exception relating to relocations, any other tax gross-up payments with officers.	
On February 4, 2013, we completed the acquisition of Comverse Technology, Inc. ("CTI"), our former parent company, eliminating CTI's majority ownership and control of us (the "CTI Merger"). Following the completion of the CTI Merger, we enhanced our long-term growth strategy with a focus on three areas of the Actionable Intelligence market: Customer Engagement Optimization, Security Intelligence, and Fraud, Risk and Compliance. We achieved an early milestone in the execution of the Customer Engagement Optimization portion of this strategy with the acquisition of KANA Software, Inc. on February 3, 2014, which transaction was negotiated and signed during the year ended January 31, 2014. We also continued to add human capital resources and make investments in infrastructure to support the long-term growth of our business. In addition to these initiatives, key operational results that were reflected in or drove our executive compensation decisions for the year ended January 31, 2014 included:
 	 	
•	Increase in non-GAAP revenue by 7.3%, from $848.1 million to $910.0 million; and	
 	 	
•	Increase in non-GAAP operating income by 11.0%, from $189.2 million to $210.0 million.	
Based on these performance results and other relevant considerations, we took the following significant actions or made the following key decisions regarding executive compensation for the year ended January 31, 2014:
 	 	
•	Increased base salaries by 2.5%, consistent with our regular company merit increase for the year;	
 	 	
•	Based on an assessment that target bonuses were in the past generally positioned below market vis-à-vis the compensation peer group, increased target bonus opportunities by approximately 13.7% as part of a two-year process of migrating target bonuses towards market levels begun in the year ended January 31, 2013;	
 	 	
•	Awarded officer bonus payouts ranging from 104.0% to 106.0% of target (by individual) based on our financial and operational results, including revenue at 102.2% of our target goal, operating income at 106.0% of our target goal, and cash flow from operations at 115.8% of our target goal; and	
 	 	
•	Approved performance equity vesting levels ranging from 108.0% to 110.3% of target (by tranche) based on the level of achievement of our revenue and operating income goals described above.	
Based on our review of our business and operational results for the year ended January 31, 2014 compared to our corresponding executive compensation decisions, we believe we successfully operated a “pay for performance” executive compensation program for the year ended January 31, 2014, as further discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement.
The board of directors strongly endorses our executive compensation program and recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion in this proxy statement, is hereby APPROVED.”
The advisory vote regarding the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. This is not considered a routine matter and banks, brokers, or other nominees may not vote without instructions from the stockholder. Broker non-votes will not affect whether this proposal is approved, however, abstentions will count as votes against this proposal.
If no voting specification is made on a properly returned or voted proxy card, the person or persons voting your shares pursuant to instructions by proxy card will vote FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive
officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" PROPOSAL NO. 3.

9

OTHER MATTERS
As of the date of this proxy statement, we know of no business that will be presented for consideration at the 2014 Annual Meeting other than the items referred to above. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting for action by stockholders, the person or persons voting your shares pursuant to instructions by proxy card will be authorized to vote your shares in accordance with the policies of Verint and will use their discretion accordingly. The chairman of the 2014 Annual Meeting may refuse to allow presentation of a proposal or a nominee for the board of directors if the proposal or nominee was not properly submitted.

10

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Guidelines
All of our employees, including our executive officers, are required to comply with our Code of Conduct. Additionally, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and senior officers must comply with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers. The purpose of these corporate policies is to ensure to the greatest possible extent that our business is conducted in a consistently legal and ethical manner. The text of the Code of Conduct and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers is available on our website at http://www.verint.com/About/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-policies . We intend to disclose on our website any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our policies as required by law.
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
The board of directors believes that the person who holds the position of our Chief Executive Officer should also serve as one of our directors. We currently separate the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board which reflects our belief, at this time, that our stockholders' interests are best served with the day-to-day management and direction of the company under Mr. Bodner, as President and Chief Executive Officer, and with the experience and perspective brought to the board of directors by Mr. DeMarines, as our Chairman. As directors continue to have more oversight responsibility than ever before, we believe it is beneficial to have a Chairman or a lead director whose sole focus is leading the board, allowing our Chief Executive Officer to focus on running the company. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer is most familiar with our business and industry, and most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities and leading the discussion and execution of strategy, while our Chairman, with over twelve years of experience on our board, provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer, presides over meetings of the board of directors, and brings a depth of varied financial and business experience, including managing a security-based company and serving as a director of a public technology company. We believe that separating the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, or the designation of a lead director, helps create an environment that is more conducive to objective evaluation and oversight of management's performance, increasing management accountability and improving the ability of our board of directors to monitor whether management's actions are in the best interests of Verint and its stockholders. We believe our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman have a good working relationship. The board annually reviews its structure and processes to assess whether changes in facts and circumstances or the company's needs require changes to this structure or these processes.
The board of directors, as a whole, and in particular the audit committee of the board of directors, has an active role in overseeing management of our risks. The board of directors believes an effective risk management system will (1) timely identify the material risks that we face, (2) communicate necessary information with respect to material risks to senior executives and, as appropriate, to the board of directors or relevant committees, (3) implement appropriate and responsive risk management strategies consistent with our risk profile, and (4) integrate risk management into our decision-making.
The board of directors and its committees regularly receive information regarding our financial position, capital structure, operations, strategy, compensation, compliance, and risk management from senior management. During its review of such information, the board of directors and its committees discuss, review, and analyze risks associated with each area, as applicable.
 	 	
•	The compensation committee discusses, reviews, and analyzes risks associated with our compensation plans and arrangements. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional information.	
 	 	
•	The audit committee oversees management of financial and compliance risks, including with respect to financial reporting, credit and liquidity, information security, compliance, potential conflicts of interest, and related party transactions.	
 	 	
•	The corporate governance & nominating committee oversees risks associated with our overall governance practices, the leadership structure of our board of directors, and management succession planning.	
The entire board of directors is also regularly informed about the activities of its committees through committee reports. Under the oversight of the board of directors and its committee, we have also implemented programs designed to help manage the risks to which we are exposed in our business and to align risk-taking appropriately with our efforts to increase stockholder value. For example, we have implemented an enterprise risk assessment to identify, assess, govern, and manage risks and a quarterly survey process which seeks to ensure that material information about our operations, finances, and compliance activities are effectively conveyed to senior management on a timely basis.

11

Director Independence
As required by the NASDAQ Global Select Market's (“NASDAQ”) listing standards, a majority of the members of our board of directors must qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively determined by the board of directors. The board of directors evaluates the independence of its members at least annually and at other appropriate times (e.g., in connection with a change in employment status or other significant status changes) when a change in circumstances could potentially impact the independence or effectiveness of one of our directors.
After review of all relevant transactions and relationships between each director, any of their family members, Verint, our executive officers and our independent registered public accounting firm, the board of directors has affirmatively determined that a majority of our current board is comprised of independent directors. The board of directors has determined that Messrs. DeMarines, Egan, Myers, Nottenburg, Safir and Shanks are “independent” for purposes of NASDAQ's governance listing standards (specifically, NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2)). The remaining member of our current board of directors, Mr. Bodner, does not satisfy these “independence” definitions because he is an executive officer. A discussion of the independence qualifications of our board members under applicable committee standards appears below under "—Committees of the Board of Directors".
Board Attendance
The board of directors held fifteen meetings during the year ended January 31, 2014. During that period, each incumbent director attended over 75% of the meetings of the board of directors and the committees on which he served that were held during his tenure as director. As a general matter, all directors are encouraged to attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our last Annual Meeting of Stockholders was on June 25, 2013. At that meeting, all seven directors then serving on our board of directors were present, either in person or telephonically. All of our board members are expected to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting, either in person or telephonically. Our independent directors hold executive sessions outside the presence of management regularly.
Communication with the Board of Directors
Stockholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with our board of directors, a board committee, or with an individual director may do so by sending an email to boardofdirectors@verint.com or writing to such group or persons at:
Verint Systems Inc.
330 South Service Road
Melville, New York 11747
Attention: Corporate Secretary
Communications should specify the addressee(s) and the general topic of the communication. Our Corporate Secretary will review and sort communications before forwarding them to the addressee(s). Concerns relating to accounting or auditing matters or possible violations of our Code of Conduct or our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers should be reported pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Code of Conduct and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers, as applicable, which are available on our website at http://www.verint.com/About/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-policies .
Committees of the Board of Directors
As of the date of this proxy statement, the board of directors consists of seven directors and has three standing committees to assist it in carrying out its obligations: the corporate governance & nominating committee, the audit committee, and the compensation committee. The stock option committee was dissolved effective February 4, 2013.
Each standing committee has adopted a formal charter that describes in more detail its purpose, organizational structure, and responsibilities. A copy of the committee charters for our corporate governance & nominating committee, audit committee, and compensation committee can be found on our website at http://www.verint.com/About/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-policies . The members of the respective committees satisfy the applicable qualification requirements of the SEC, NASDAQ and the respective charter.
A description of each committee and its membership follows.

12

Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee
For the year ended January 31, 2014, our corporate governance & nominating committee consisted of Messrs. Egan (Chair), DeMarines, and Safir. Shefali Shah, one of the former CTI designees to our board of directors, also served on this committee briefly during such year from February 1, 2013 until the closing of the CTI Merger on February 4, 2013. The current members of our corporate governance & nominating committee are all independent directors within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards.
The corporate governance & nominating committee met four times during the year ended January 31, 2014.
The corporate governance & nominating committee’s responsibilities are set forth in its charter and include, among other things:
 	 	
•	responsibility for establishing our corporate governance guidelines;	
 	 	
•	overseeing the board of director’s operations and effectiveness; and	
 	 	
•	identifying, screening, and recommending qualified candidates to serve on the board of directors.	
The corporate governance & nominating committee of the board of directors makes recommendations on director nominees to the board of directors and will consider director candidate recommendations from a variety of sources, including director candidates suggested by existing directors and by stockholders, if properly submitted in accordance with the applicable procedures set forth in our by-laws. For a description of the process for nominating directors in accordance with our by-laws, please refer to “Stockholder Proposals for the 2015 Annual Meeting” in this proxy statement. Pursuant to our corporate governance guidelines contained within our corporate governance & nominating committee charter, the corporate governance & nominating committee will seek members from diverse professional and personal backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with the highest ethical character and that share the values of Verint. The assessment of candidates for the board includes an individual’s independence, as well as consideration of diversity, age, high personal and professional ethical standards, sound business judgment, personal and professional accomplishment, background, and skills in the context of the needs of the board of directors. In connection with its annual review of its charter, the corporate governance & nominating committee assesses the effectiveness of its selection criteria set forth in our corporate governance guidelines. The composition of the current board of directors reflects diversity in business and professional experience, skills, and age among our directors.
Audit Committee
We have a separately designated standing audit committee established as contemplated by Section 10A of the Exchange Act. For the year ended January 31, 2014, our audit committee consisted of Messrs. Myers (Chair), DeMarines, Safir, and Shanks. The audit committee oversees the engagement of our independent registered public accountants, reviews our annual financial statements and the scope of annual audits, and considers matters relating to accounting policies and internal controls.
Each member of the audit committee meets the independence criteria prescribed by applicable regulation and the rules of the SEC for audit committee membership and is an “independent director” within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards. Each audit committee member meets NASDAQ's financial sophistication requirements, and the board of directors has further determined that Messrs. Myers and Shanks are “audit committee financial experts” as such term is defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. Stockholders should understand that this designation is an SEC disclosure requirement relating to Mr. Myers' and Mr. Shanks' experience and understanding of certain accounting and auditing matters, which the SEC has stated does not impose on the director so designated any additional duty, obligation, or liability than otherwise is imposed generally by virtue of serving on the audit committee and/or the board of directors.
The audit committee met six times during the year ended January 31, 2014.
The audit committee’s responsibilities are set forth in its charter and include, among other things:
 	 	
•	assisting the board of directors in its oversight of our compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, which includes oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial reporting, internal controls, and audit functions as well as general risk oversight; and	
 	 	
•	direct and sole responsibility for appointing, retaining, compensating, and monitoring the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm.	
A separate report of the audit committee is included in this proxy statement.

13

Compensation Committee
For the year ended January 31, 2014 (from and after February 4, 2013), our compensation committee consisted of Messrs. Nottenburg (Chair), Safir, and Shanks. Prior to the closing of the CTI Merger on February 4, 2013, Mr. DeMarines had served as a member and chairman of this committee, and Mark Terrell, one of the former CTI designees to our board of directors, also served on this committee. The board of directors has affirmatively determined that the current members of the compensation committee are all independent directors within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards, and all of the members are “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and “outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The compensation committee met eight times during the year ended January 31, 2014.
The compensation committee’s responsibilities are set forth in its charter and include, among other things:
 	 	
•	approving compensation arrangements for our executive officers; and	
 	 	
•	administering our stock incentive compensation plans and approving all grants of equity awards, except that equity grants to non-employee directors are approved by the full board of directors unless the board of directors delegates such authority to the compensation committee following its review.	
The compensation committee has the authority to retain third-party consultants and independent advisors to discharge these responsibilities. The compensation committee assesses the independence and any potential conflicts of interest of compensation advisors in accordance with applicable law and NASDAQ listing standards. Additional discussion regarding the role of third-party consultants, independent advisors, and our executive officers in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive compensation is included in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement.
A separate Compensation Committee Report is also included in this proxy statement.
Current Committee Membership
As of the date of this proxy statement, the membership of each of our standing committees is as follows:

Director	Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee	Audit Committee	Compensation Committee	
Bodner, Dan	 	 	 	
DeMarines, Victor	X	X	 	
Egan, John	X (Chair)	 	X	
Myers, Larry	 	X (Chair)	 	
Nottenburg, Richard	 	 	X (Chair)	
Safir, Howard	X	X	X	
Shanks, Earl	 	X	X	

14

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions of our executive officers as of the date of this filing:

Name	 	Age	 	Position(s)	
 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner	 	55	 	President, Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Officer, and Director	
Douglas Robinson	 	58	 	Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Officer	
Elan Moriah	 	51	 	President, Enterprise Intelligence Solutions and Video and Situation Intelligence Solutions and Corporate Officer	
Meir Sperling	 	65	 	Chief Strategy Officer and Corporate Officer (and former President, Communications and Cyber Intelligence Solutions)	
Peter Fante	 	46	 	Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Officer	
Dan Bodner serves as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Officer, and a director. Mr. Bodner has served as our President and/or Chief Executive Officer and as a director since 1994. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Bodner also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Comverse Government Systems Corp., a former affiliate of ours. Prior to such positions, from 1987 to 1991, Mr. Bodner held various management positions at CTI.
Douglas Robinson serves as our Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Officer. Mr. Robinson has served in such capacity since late 2006. Prior to joining us, Mr. Robinson spent 17 years at CA Technologies (formerly CA, Inc. and Computer Associates International, Inc.), where he held the positions of Senior Vice President, Finance, Americas Division, Corporate Controller, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Chief Financial Officer of CA’s iCan SP subsidiary, and Senior Vice President Investor Relations, among other positions.
Elan Moriah serves as President of our Enterprise Intelligence Solutions and Video and Situation Intelligence Solutions global business lines and Corporate Officer. Mr. Moriah has served in such capacity since 2008, having previously served as our President, Americas from 2004 to 2008 and as President of our Contact Center business unit from 2000 to 2004. Prior to joining us, Mr. Moriah held various management positions with Motorola Inc., where he served as Business Development Manager for Europe, Middle East, and Africa, Worldwide Network Services Division and as Vice President of Marketing and Sales of a paging subsidiary. Before then, Mr. Moriah worked for Comet Software Inc., as Vice President of Marketing and Sales and as Operations Manager.
Meir Sperling serves as our Chief Strategy Officer and Corporate Officer. Mr. Sperling has served as Chief Strategy Officer since May 2013, having previously served as President of our Communications and Cyber Intelligence Solutions global business line and Corporate Officer from 2000 to April 2013. He also served as President, APAC (Asia Pacific) from 2006 to 2007. Before joining us, Mr. Sperling served as Corporate Vice President of ECI Telecom Ltd. (“ECI”) as General Manager of its Business Systems Division, and Director of several ECI subsidiaries. Before then, Mr. Sperling held various management positions with Tadiran Telecommunications Communications Ltd. as well as with Tadiran Ltd and TEI, a U.S. subsidiary.
Peter Fante serves as our Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Officer. Mr. Fante was appointed as General Counsel in 2002 (subsequently retitled as Chief Legal Officer) and Chief Compliance Officer in 2008. He previously served as our Secretary from 2005 to early 2011. Prior to joining us, Mr. Fante was an associate at various global law firms including Morrison & Foerster LLP, Shearman & Sterling, and Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP.

15

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes in detail our named executive officer compensation program and addresses how we made compensation decisions for such officers for the year ended January 31, 2014.
This discussion covers the principles underlying our executive compensation policies and our most important executive compensation decisions for the year ended January 31, 2014, and provides our analysis of these policies and decisions. We have included certain information in this CD&A (and this section generally) for periods subsequent to January 31, 2014 that we believe may be useful for a more complete understanding of our executive compensation arrangements. While the focus of this discussion is on our compensation arrangements with our named executive officers, in some cases we also provide information about compensation arrangements with our other executives or our employees generally where we believe it may be useful for providing context for our named executive officer compensation arrangements.
Executive Summary
We are a global leader in Actionable Intelligence® solutions. Actionable Intelligence is a necessity in a dynamic world of massive information growth because it empowers organizations with crucial insights and enables decision makers to anticipate, respond, and take action. With our solutions and value-added services, organizations of all sizes and across many industries can make more timely and effective decisions. Today, more than 10,000 organizations in over 180 countries, including over 80 percent of the Fortune 100, use Verint solutions to improve enterprise performance and make the world a safer place.
The goal of our executive compensation program is to attract and retain the best talent to lead our company. Our philosophy in setting executive compensation is to provide incentives to our named executive officers to achieve outstanding performance results, to outperform our direct competitors, and to optimize stockholder value. To support this philosophy, we set target compensation in a range around median and structure our compensation arrangements so that actual pay outcomes will vary (above or below target) based on the performance achieved. Our executive compensation program seeks to align executive compensation with stockholder value on an annual and long-term basis as follows:
 	 	
•	Executive pay consists of a mix of base pay, annual bonus, and long-term equity-based incentives;	
 	 	
•	Annual bonuses are based on revenue, profitability, cash flow, and individual objectives, are subject to a minimum threshold level of performance below which no payout is earned, and are limited to a specified maximum payout, which for the year ended January 31, 2014 was 150% of target;	
 	 	
•	Long-term incentive awards are comprised of a combination of time-based and performance-based restricted stock units, which are designed to link executive compensation with increased stockholder value over time, with the performance-based awards subject to a minimum threshold level of performance below which no payout is earned, and a specified maximum payout, which for the year ended January 31, 2014 was 125% of target; and	
 	 	
•	A significant majority of the total direct compensation of each named executive officer is at-risk or is paid in equity (whose value depends on our stock price), specifically, approximately 90% for our Chief Executive Officer and approximately 80% on average for the other named executive officers (calculated based on the value of equity (both time-based and performance-based) plus performance-based bonuses received in the year ended January 31, 2014, as a function of total compensation). Performance-based equity and performance-based bonuses alone accounted for approximately 55% of our Chief Executive Officer's total direct compensation and approximately 50% of the total direct compensation of each of our other named executive officers.	

16

We also have several governance programs in place to align executive compensation with stockholder interests and mitigate risks in our compensation plans. These programs include:
 	 	
•	a clawback policy;	
 	 	
•	stock ownership guidelines;	
 	 	
•	limited perquisites;	
 	 	
•	use of tally sheets;	
 	 	
•	a policy prohibiting hedging or significant pledging in our securities by our officers and directors; and	
 	 	
•	a policy precluding us from entering into any new plan, program, agreement, or arrangement providing for a 280G tax gross-up payment with any person or, subject to a limited exception relating to relocations, any other tax gross-up payments with officers.	
Results for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
On February 4, 2013, we completed the acquisition of CTI, our former parent company, eliminating CTI's majority ownership and control of us. Following the completion of the CTI Merger, we enhanced our long-term growth strategy with a focus on three areas of the Actionable Intelligence market: Customer Engagement Optimization, Security Intelligence, and Fraud, Risk and Compliance. We achieved an early milestone in the execution of the Customer Engagement Optimization portion of this strategy with the acquisition of KANA Software, Inc. on February 3, 2014, which transaction was negotiated and signed during the year ended January 31, 2014. We also continued to add human capital resources and make investments in infrastructure to support the long-term growth of our business. In addition to these initiatives, key operational results that were reflected in or drove our executive compensation decisions for the year ended January 31, 2014 included:
 	 	
•	Increase in non-GAAP revenue by 7.3%, from $848.1 million to $910.0 million; and	
 	 	
•	Increase in non-GAAP operating income by 11.0%, from $189.2 million to $210.0 million.	
Pay-for-Performance Results
Based on our review of our business and operational results for the year ended January 31, 2014 compared to our corresponding executive compensation decisions, we believe we successfully operated a "pay for performance" executive compensation program for the year ended January 31, 2014. Specifically, we took the following significant actions or made the following key decisions regarding executive compensation for the year ended January 31, 2014:
 	 	
•	Increased base salaries by 2.5%, consistent with our regular company merit increase for the year;	
 	 	
•	Based on an assessment that target bonuses were in the past generally positioned below market vis-à-vis the compensation peer group, increased target bonus opportunities by approximately 13.7% as part of a two-year process of migrating target bonuses towards market levels begun in the year ended January 31, 2013;	
 	 	
•	Awarded officer bonus payouts ranging from 104.0% to 106.0% of target (by individual) based on our financial and operational results, including revenue at 102.2% of our target goal, operating income at 106.0% of our target goal, and cash flow from operations at 115.8% of our target goal; and	
 	 	
•	Approved performance equity vesting levels ranging from 108.0% to 110.3% of target (by tranche) based on the level of achievement of our revenue and operating income goals described above.	
The following discussion should be read together with the information we present in the compensation tables, the footnotes and narratives to those tables, and the related disclosures appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement.
Recent Developments in Executive Compensation Practices
Our compensation committee annually evaluates our compensation practices in light of, among other things, developments in executive compensation and corporate governance, market trends, and competitive factors.
Throughout the second half of 2013 and the beginning of 2014, the compensation committee worked with its consultant, legal advisors, and members of senior management to design a new, long-term performance equity plan. The new plan enhances the long-term focus of our performance equity program, making use of multi-year performance goals, which we believe are an important driver of stockholder value creation. On April 17, 2014, the compensation committee implemented the new design for the first time, granting performance-based RSUs to our named executive officers and certain other executives which vest one-third based on a revenue metric, one-third based on an EBITDA metric, and one-third based on a relative total stockholder return metric, over a single 2-year performance period. This new design replaced our historical performance-equity award design, which vested based on three 1-year performance periods, but which continues to be in place for existing outstanding

17

awards. The new design is not expected to alter our practice of granting equity to our named executive officers on an annual basis.
Compensation Philosophy and Design
Philosophy and Objectives of Compensation Program
Our philosophy in setting executive compensation is to provide incentives to our named executive officers to achieve outstanding performance results, to outperform our direct competitors, and to optimize stockholder value. To support this philosophy, we set target compensation in a range around median and structure our compensation arrangements so that actual pay outcomes will vary (above or below target) based on the performance achieved. The compensation committee periodically reviews our compensation philosophy and may make adjustments from time to time based on the needs of the organization.
We believe that our compensation philosophy, including the opportunity to earn above-market compensation for performance in excess of goals, ensures that we are well positioned to attract and retain the highest caliber of executive officer talent and to properly incentivize our officers. Our named executive officer compensation packages are generally comprised of a mix of base salary, annual cash bonus, and annual equity grant, plus limited perquisites. We believe this relatively simple mix of compensation elements allows us to successfully achieve the foregoing compensation objectives, however, as noted above, the compensation committee periodically re-evaluates our compensation philosophy, objectives, and tools and, from time to time, revises or introduces new elements into our executive compensation program.
We believe a significant portion of each officer's compensation should be “at-risk” by being tied to the performance of our business or our stock price. We implement this belief through the use of performance-based bonuses and performance-vested equity, for which payment or vesting is directly dependent on performance, as well as through the use of equity-based compensation generally, such as restricted stock units (“RSUs”), the value of which depends on our stock price. We believe that equity-based compensation that is subject to vesting based on continued employment is also an effective tool for retaining our officers, aligning their interests with those of our stockholders, and for building long-term commitment to the company. As further discussed below, our officers and directors are also subject to stock ownership guidelines.
Roles and Responsibilities in Determining Executive Compensation
The compensation committee establishes our officer compensation packages and determines cash payout and performance equity vesting levels for performance-based compensation after the conclusion of the relevant performance period. The compensation committee also administers our equity compensation plans and oversees our long-term incentive programs generally and any special compensation initiatives.
The compensation committee receives updates from its compensation consultant and/or outside counsel at least annually on recent developments and trends in executive compensation and related governance matters to assist it in making compensation decisions.
For the year ended January 31, 2014, the compensation committee engaged Towers Watson to prepare a peer group compensation “benchmarking” analysis for our officer compensation packages and to assist the compensation committee in structuring and evaluating proposed officer compensation packages as well as year-end payouts. Any advice provided by Towers Watson in the year ended January 31, 2014 with respect to non-officer or director personnel has not exceeded $120,000 in fees and/or has been with respect to broad-based plans that do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our officers or directors and are available generally to all employees. The compensation committee also received advice from outside counsel during the year ended January 31, 2014. In April 2013, the compensation committee reviewed and confirmed the independence of its advisors pursuant to the six-factor test recently promulgated by the SEC under the Dodd-Frank Act.
In establishing the compensation packages for our named executive officers each year, the compensation committee also reviews the various components and amounts of compensation being considered for each officer through the use of “tally sheets” or similar compensation summaries.
With the compensation committee's permission or at the compensation committee's request, selected members of senior management from our human resources, finance, or legal functions generally work cooperatively with the compensation consultant in preparing proposals for officer compensation packages or other executive compensation arrangements for consideration by the compensation committee. The compensation consultant at all times remains independent of management and forms its own views with respect to the recommendations it makes to the compensation committee. The compensation committee also met in executive session (outside the presence of management), both with and without its compensation consultant, during the year ended January 31, 2014.
The Chief Executive Officer provides input to the compensation committee on each proposed executive officer compensation package. The Chief Executive Officer's input to the compensation committee is based, among other things, on his views of each

18

officer's performance, achievements, skills, and responsibilities, competitive factors, and internal pay equity considerations. Notwithstanding the Chief Executive Officer's input, the compensation committee exercises independent judgment on executive compensation and is solely responsible for final decisions on such matters.
Peer Group
The composition of the peer group used for benchmarking analyses prepared by the compensation consultant for the year ended January 31, 2014 was developed following discussions between the compensation committee, Towers Watson, and members of senior management, primarily our Chief Executive Officer. Based on these discussions, for the year ended January 31, 2014, the compensation committee determined to leave the peer group unchanged from the prior year:

ACI Worldwide, Inc.	MICROS Systems, Inc.	
Cadence Design Systems Inc.	Nuance Communications, Inc.	
Compuware Corporation	Open Text Corp.	
Constellation Software Inc.	Parametric Technology Corporation	
FLIR Systems, Inc.	Pegasystems Inc.	
Informatica Corp.	Quest Software Inc.	
JDA Software Group Inc.	Salesforce.com, Inc.	
Macdonald Dettwiler & Associates Ltd.	Solera Holdings Inc.	
Mentor Graphics Corp.	Synopsys Inc.	
MicroStrategy Inc.	TIBCO Software Inc.	
The companies included in the peer group were selected by the compensation committee from a sampling of publicly traded software and technology companies with businesses similar to ours and with annual revenues, market capitalizations, and/or enterprise values within a range above and below ours that the compensation committee believed was relevant. In general, certain of our closest competitors do not fit within these parameters, either because they are much larger or much smaller than us, are privately held, or are foreign issuers who do not publicly file detailed compensation data or have different pay practices due to local market factors outside the U.S. The compensation committee also considers the growth profile of potential peer group companies and competitive considerations with regard to our business as well as recruiting and retention. During its annual review, the compensation committee seeks, to the extent practical, to maintain consistency in the peer group in an effort to maintain consistency from year to year in the results of the benchmarking process.
Overview of the Establishment of Officer Compensation for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
In establishing actual cash and equity target award levels for each named executive officer, and the mix between cash compensation and equity compensation, the factors considered by the compensation committee consisted of:
 	 	
•	the compensation benchmarking analysis prepared each year by the compensation consultant;	
 	 	
•	the officer's compensation for the previous year;	
 	 	
•	a subjective assessment of the officer's performance in the previous year;	
 	 	
•	our performance in the previous year;	
 	 	
•	our growth, based on both financial and non-financial metrics, from the previous year;	
 	 	
•	our outlook and operating plan for the upcoming year;	
 	 	
•	the proposed packages for the other executive officers (internal pay equity);	
 	 	
•	the proposed merit increases, if any, being offered to our employees generally;	
 	 	
•	the size of the aggregate equity pool available for awards for the year and the relative allocation of such pool between the officers and the other participants;	
 	 	
•	overall equity dilution and burn rates as well as equity overhang levels;	
 	 	
•	the value of and expense associated with proposed and previously awarded equity grants, including the continuing retentive value of past awards;	
 	 	
•	executive officer recruiting and retention considerations; and	
 	 	
•	compensation trends and competitive factors in the market for talent in which we compete.	

Elements of compensation were considered by the compensation committee individually and in the aggregate in its decision making process. Although the compensation committee does not target a specific ratio of equity to cash, the compensation committee believes that equity should comprise a majority of each named executive officer’s compensation package in order to foster a greater sense of personal investment in our performance, further aligning officer incentives with the interests of our

19

stockholders, and increasing the amount of such officer's compensation that is “at risk” by virtue of being dependent on our stock price or performance. Subject to the parameters of our compensation philosophy, the compensation committee also believes that it is appropriate for our Chief Executive Officer to be compensated more highly from both a cash and an equity perspective than our other named executive officers, and this approach has been supported by our benchmarking analyses. In establishing the relative compensation of the other named executive officers, the compensation committee is, as noted above, also especially mindful of internal pay equity and takes into account differences in the scope of each officer's responsibilities.

The financial performance goals established by our compensation committee for bonus plans and performance equity awards are based on our internal operating plan, which uses non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) measures that our board of directors and senior management find useful in managing our business. See Appendix A to this proxy statement for additional information. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) contemplated by the budget approved by the board of directors are included in measuring performance against compensation goals. For other extraordinary non-budgeted events, including material M&A, the compensation committee or the board of directors may normalize performance results to ensure comparability with performance goals, unless otherwise provided under the terms of the applicable award, such as the 2013 Special Grants (discussed below), which awards were intended to capture the impact of extraordinary changes to the business, including M&A. Under the new 2-year performance awards granted in April 2014 (also discussed below), the board of directors will determine whether and to what extent such normalization will be required at the time any such extraordinary transactions are first approved.
Elements of Compensation - Establishment and Payouts for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
Base Salary
Base salaries for our named executive officers are subject to adjustment annually by the compensation committee as part of its regular compensation review process based on the benchmarking process and the other factors described above, as well as special achievements, promotions, and other facts and circumstances specific to the individual officer. For the year ended January 31, 2014, officer base salaries were increased by 2.5%.
Annual Bonus
Each of our named executive officers is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus. As with base salaries, target bonuses are established annually by the compensation committee as part of its regular compensation review process described above, taking into account the terms of each officer's employment agreement.
For the year ended January 31, 2014, target bonus opportunities were increased by approximately 13.7%, as part of a two-year process of migrating target bonuses towards market levels begun in the year ended January 31, 2013, based on an assessment that target bonuses were in the past generally positioned below market vis-à-vis the compensation peer group. Bonus payouts are based on our and officer performance by reference to pre-defined performance goals established by the compensation committee as part of the regular compensation review process as well as based on qualitative factors related to each officer's achievements and performance review.
Performance goals for bonus plans for the year ended January 31, 2014 were based on revenue, operating income, operating cash flow, and the achievement of management business objectives, which we refer to as MBOs. We believe these elements create a well-diversified set of performance goals, including a focus on revenue as our key growth driver, profitability, cash generation, and individual achievement. The most directly comparable GAAP counterpart for operating cash flow is GAAP cash from operations, as adjusted for cash-settled stock awards, cash paid for transaction costs associated with business acquisitions, cash paid for interest on debt, purchases of treasury stock, dividends paid to noncontrolling interest, net cash paid to settle foreign exchange derivative contracts not designated as hedges, the effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents, cash income received on investments, and certain other non-recurring cash transactions.
MBOs are tailored to each officer's function within the company. For the year ended January 31, 2014, the MBOs consisted of qualitative/subjective performance goals (such as devising and implementing strategic or compliance plans, improving internal financial processes, establishing new corporate functional areas, or achieving human capital goals), as well as additional quantitative goals (such as achievement of operating unit budget targets) for officers with operational responsibility.
Financial performance goals were in the form of a range in which an officer could achieve 50% of his target bonus at the low end of the performance range (or threshold), 100% of his target bonus at the middle of the performance range (target performance), and up to 150% of his target bonus at the high end of the performance range, for each performance goal, with the final bonus payout based on the combined achievement of all goals. For performance below the applicable threshold, the officer was not entitled to any bonus for that goal. For performance falling between established points in the range, the bonus payout was calculated on a formulaic basis based on those points. The compensation committee's objective in establishing a range was to align the bonus payout with actual performance.

20

The compensation committee carefully evaluates the proposed financial performance goals, as well as the proposed MBO goals, as part of its annual compensation review process, with a view to setting the financial performance targets (the middle of the performance ranges) and the MBO goals at a level that requires strong performance on the part of each recipient, but that is not so difficult to achieve that it is more likely than not that the officer will be unable to reach the goal. The compensation committee also endeavors to set threshold performance levels (and corresponding payout levels) that are reasonable in light of the goal in question and, as noted above, also provides for a cap on maximum payouts, at levels requiring extraordinary levels of achievement. Based on a view by the compensation committee and management as of the beginning of the year ended January 31, 2014 that there was an above-average level of uncertainty in the macroeconomic outlook, the compensation committee elected to (i) establish a performance-payout curve that was somewhat flatter than in previous years within a range above and below target, (ii) set threshold performance somewhat lower than in previous years, and (iii) cap maximum payouts at 150% rather than 200% as in previous years, providing for lower upside potential in exchange for greater downside protection. As described in the following section, this flatter curve drove bonus payouts generally in line with performance, but without the benefit of the accelerator feature customarily included in such a plan for performance within the flatter portion of the performance curve.
Calculation of Annual Bonus Payouts for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
The following table summarizes the annual bonus payouts for each executive officer for the year ended January 31, 2014, which were in accordance with the results of each officer’s formulaic bonus plan without discretionary adjustment by the compensation committee.

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	Target Bonus	 	 	 	Bonus Payout Amounts	
Name	In U.S. Dollars	In Local Currency	Bonus Plan Metric & Weight	Overall Calculated Achievement (2)	Final Payout Percentage	In U.S. Dollars (3)	In Local Currency	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner	$	816,000	
 	N/A	Company revenue: 30.0%	106.0%	106.0%	$	865,327	
 	N/A	
 	 	 	Company operating income: 30.0%	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	Cash flow: 20.0%	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	MBO: 20.0%	

Douglas Robinson	$	289,000	
 	N/A	Company revenue: 30.0%	105.2%	105.2%	$	304,158	
 	N/A	
 	 	 	Company operating income: 30.0%	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	Cash flow: 20.0%	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	MBO: 20.0%	

Elan Moriah	$	289,000	
 	N/A	Company revenue: 30.0%	104.0%	104.0%	$	300,690	
 	N/A	
 	 	 	Company operating income: 30.0%	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	Cash flow: 20.0%	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	MBO: 20.0%	

Meir Sperling (1)	$	240,728	
 	NIS 842,000	Company revenue: 30.0%	104.6%	104.6%	$	251,909	
 	NIS 881,110	
 	 	 	Company operating income: 30.0%	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	Cash flow: 20.0%	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	MBO: 20.0%	

Peter Fante	$	221,000	
 	N/A	Company revenue: 30.0%	106.0%	106.0%	$	234,359	
 	N/A	
 	 	 	Company operating income: 30.0%	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	Cash flow: 20.0%	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	MBO: 20.0%	

(1) Shown in U.S. dollars for comparative purposes only, based on the exchange rate at or about the time of the compensation committee's compensation review for the year. As noted in the local currency column, Mr. Sperling's target bonus is set in his local currency and for the year ended January 31, 2014 was NIS 842,000.
(2) See the “Performance vs. Payout Matrix” table below for additional information on how the payout percentage was calculated for each goal.

21

(3) The U.S. dollar bonus amount for Mr. Sperling is for comparative purposes only and reflects the impact of applicable exchange rates on the applicable payment date (or date of board approval if payment had not been made as of the date of this proxy statement). The actual payment to Mr. Sperling is made in local currency and appears in the last column.

Performance vs. Payout Matrix
(applies to each officer on a goal by goal basis,
based on the officer's individualized bonus plan per the table above)

 	Payout Percentage	
 	0%	65%	75%	85%	90%	95%	98%	100%	102%	105%	110%	115%	125%	150%	
          Achievement Percentage	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Percentage of Revenue Goal	<90%	90%	92%	93%	94%	96%	98%	100%	102%	104%	106%	107%	108%	110% or more	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	Payout Percentage	
 	0%	50%	60%	70%	75%	85%	90%	100%	110%	115%	125%	130%	140%	150%	
          Achievement Percentage	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Percentage of Operating Income Goal	<65%	65%	70%	75%	80%	85%	90%	100%	110%	115%	120%	125%	130%	135% or more	
Percentage of Cash Flow Goal	<65%	65%	70%	75%	80%	85%	90%	100%	110%	115%	120%	125%	130%	135% or more	

The achievement percentage for each of the performance goals listed above was as follows: revenue, 102.2%; operating income, 106.0%; and cash flow from operations, 115.8%.
Equity Awards
Each of our named executive officers is eligible to receive an annual equity award. As with base salaries and target bonuses, named executive officer equity grants are established annually by the compensation committee as part of its regular compensation review process described above. In establishing each named executive officer's recommended annual equity award, in addition to the factors considered as part of the compensation review process generally, the compensation committee considers the portion of the aggregate pool being allocated to the officers in relation to the other participants and places special focus on internal pay equity among the officers.
The compensation committee endeavors to establish the grant date well in advance of the grant and to schedule vesting dates to occur at a time when we would not normally be in a quarterly trading blackout (to reduce the chances that vesting-related tax events occur during blackout periods). Apart from seeking to schedule vesting dates outside of blackout periods, we do not time our grants by reference to the release of earnings or other material information.
In recent years, we have used RSUs (both time-based and performance-based) as our preferred form of equity award, which provide predictable retention value and alignment of employee interests with stockholder interests, particularly in times of volatile equity markets. The compensation committee periodically reviews the elements of compensation it uses, however, and we may in the future incorporate other award forms, including stock options, in our officer compensation packages. To the extent that stock options are used, the exercise price of such options is the closing price of our stock on the date of board of directors or compensation committee approval.
For the year ended January 31, 2014, annual equity awards for our named executive officers were divided evenly between time-vested RSU awards and performance-vested RSU awards, which we believe provides for a good alignment of officer incentives with company performance and a fair balance in the extent to which officer compensation is “at risk” both by being tied to the value of Verint's shares and to the performance of our business. Time-based RSU awards for officers vest in equal portions over a three-year period. The annual performance-based RSU awards for officers granted during the year ended January 31, 2014 vest in three tranches corresponding to three separate performance periods, each concluding at the end of a fiscal year. The compensation committee has historically set the performance goal for each such performance period following the beginning of the applicable performance period. While we believe that waiting until the beginning of the applicable performance period to set the performance goal for that period provides certain advantages, such as greater precision in tailoring the incentive effect of these awards, for the year ending January 31, 2015 and beyond, we have adopted a new performance equity design which uses a single 2-year performance period, to emphasize a longer-term performance perspective.

22

Annual performance-vested RSUs granted in the year ended January 31, 2014 vest 50% based on revenue and 50% based on operating income. In performance RSU grants awarded in the year ended January 31, 2012 and prior, we used revenue as the only goal for simplicity of administration and to incentivize our officers to achieve maximum top line growth. The compensation committee decided to incorporate operating income as a second performance metric for the year ended January 31, 2013 and the year ended January 31, 2014 in order to diversify the goals and incorporate a profitability component into the vesting requirements. Performance equity awards granted in the year ending January 31, 2015 are based one-third on revenue, one-third on EBITDA, and one-third on relative total stockholder return. The compensation committee elected to include relative total stockholder return in the new performance equity plan in order to increase the alignment of such plan with the interests of our stockholders.
The revenue and, to the extent applicable, operating income goals for the named executive officer performance equity awards for the January 31, 2014 performance period were set at the same target levels, and using the same methodology, as described above under “—Elements of Compensation—Annual Bonus” for the annual bonus goals. As with the annual bonus goals, these goals were in the form of a range, in which an officer could earn from 50% to 125% of the target number of RSUs based on the achievement of the performance goal(s). For performance below the applicable threshold, the officer would not receive any vesting for the tranche in question. For performance falling between established points in the range, the amount earned is calculated on a formulaic basis based on those points. As discussed above, based on a view by the compensation committee and management as of the beginning of the year ended January 31, 2014 that there was an above-average level of uncertainty in the macroeconomic outlook, the compensation committee elected to (i) establish a performance-payout curve for the performance RSU awards that was somewhat flatter than in previous years within a range above and below target, (ii) set threshold performance somewhat lower than in previous years (and slightly lower than the revenue goal for the annual bonus plans), and (iii) cap maximum payouts at 125% (rather than 200% as in previous years) at a somewhat lower level of performance than in previous years. As with the annual bonus plans, the flatter curve provided for lower upside potential in exchange for greater downside protection, however, in order to incentivize overachievement, the curve for the performance equity awards was calibrated so that the accelerator feature began to apply closer to the target performance level than in the annual bonus plan.

23

Calculation of Performance Equity Vesting for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
The following table summarizes the performance versus payout matrices established by the compensation committee for the performance period ended January 31, 2014, as well as the actual goal achievement and calculated vesting levels for the outstanding performance equity awards for such period. The actual vesting levels were equal to the calculated vesting levels without adjustment by the compensation committee.

Performance vs. Payout Matrix (for third tranche of awards approved April 12, 2011))	 	
Opportunity	 	Payout For This Goal	 	
Percentage of Revenue Goal Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Eligible to be Earned for Period	 	Percentage of Revenue Goal Actually Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Actually Earned for Period	 	
Less than 85%	 	—%	 	102.2%	 	108.0%	 	
85%	 	50%	 	 	 	 	 	
100%	 	100%	 	 	 	 	 	
107% or more	 	125%	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Performance vs. Payout Matrix (for second tranche of awards approved April 26, 2012)	 	
Opportunity	 	Payout For This Goal	 	
Percentage of Revenue Goal Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Eligible to be Earned for Period	 	Percentage of Revenue Goal Actually Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Actually Earned for Period	 	
Less than 85%	 	—%	 	102.2%	 	106.2%	 	
85%	 	50%	 	 	 	 	 	
90%	 	90%	 	 	 	 	 	
92%	 	92%	 	 	 	 	 	
95%	 	95%	 	 	 	 	 	
100%	 	100%	 	 	 	 	 	
102%	 	102%	 	 	 	 	 	
107% or more	 	125%	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Opportunity	 	Payout For This Goal	 	
Percentage of Operating Income Goal Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Eligible to be Earned for Period	 	Percentage of Operating Income Goal Actually Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Actually Earned for Period	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Less than 65%	 	—%	 	106.0%	 	114.3%	 	
65%	 	50%	 	 	 	 	 	
70%	 	70%	 	 	 	 	 	
85%	 	85%	 	 	 	 	 	
95%	 	95%	 	 	 	 	 	
100%	 	100%	 	 	 	 	 	
102%	 	102%	 	 	 	 	 	
110% or more	 	125%	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Overall Payout (Average of Payouts For Each Goal)	 	
 	 	 	 	Percentage of Combined Goals Actually Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Earned for Period Overall	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	104.1%	 	110.3%	 	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

24

 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Performance vs. Payout Matrix (for first tranche of awards approved April 19, 2013)	 	
Opportunity	 	Payout For This Goal	 	
Percentage of Revenue Goal Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Eligible to be Earned for Period	 	Percentage of Revenue Goal Actually Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Actually Earned for Period	 	
Less than 85%	 	—%	 	102.2%	 	106.2%	 	
85%	 	50%	 	 	 	 	 	
90%	 	90%	 	 	 	 	 	
92%	 	92%	 	 	 	 	 	
95%	 	95%	 	 	 	 	 	
100%	 	100%	 	 	 	 	 	
102%	 	102%	 	 	 	 	 	
107% or more	 	125%	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Opportunity	 	Payout For This Goal	 	
Percentage of Operating Income Goal Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Eligible to be Earned for Period	 	Percentage of Operating Income Goal Actually Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Actually Earned for Period	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Less than 65%	 	—%	 	106.0%	 	114.3%	 	
65%	 	50%	 	 	 	 	 	
70%	 	70%	 	 	 	 	 	
85%	 	85%	 	 	 	 	 	
95%	 	95%	 	 	 	 	 	
100%	 	100%	 	 	 	 	 	
102%	 	102%	 	 	 	 	 	
110% or more	 	125%	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Overall Payout (Average of Payouts For Each Goal)	 	
 	 	 	 	Percentage of Combined Goals Actually Achieved	 	Percentage of Performance Shares Earned for Period Overall	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	104.1%	 	110.3%	 	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

25

2013 Special Grant
On April 19, 2013, the compensation committee, with the approval of the board of directors, made a special grant of equity to our officers and certain other executives (the “2013 Special Grant”) in conjunction with our regular annual equity grant. The officer portion of the 2013 Special Grant was 165,000 shares with an aggregate grant date value of approximately $5.4 million.
The 2013 Special Grant was comprised of a time-based component (one-third of the award) and a performance-based component (two-thirds of the award). The time-based RSU component of the grant vests one-third on April 4, 2014, one-third on April 4, 2015, and one-third on April 4, 2016. The performance-based RSU component of the grant was divided into two equal groups of units, referred to below as "Revenue Units" and "EBITDA Units," each with its own vesting conditions that may be satisfied anytime within a five year period from the end of the month in which the grant was made, but subject to a two-quarter sustainability test which may be achieved any time within a six year period from the end of the month in which the grant was made. The specific number of shares awarded to each named executive officer was as follows:

Named Executive Officer	 	Time-Based RSUs	 	Performance-Based RSUs	 	Total	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner	 	25,000	 	50,000	 	75,000	
Elan Moriah	 	9,000	 	18,000	 	27,000	
Douglas Robinson	 	6,000	 	12,000	 	18,000	
Meir Sperling	 	6,000	 	12,000	 	18,000	
Peter Fante	 	6,000	 	12,000	 	18,000	
The primary purposes of the 2013 Special Grant were to further incentivize management to bring the company to a new, higher, and sustainable level of revenue-generation and profitability, thereby creating significant new stockholder value, and to reward the successful completion of the CTI Merger which eliminated CTI’s majority ownership and control of us. In making the grant, the compensation committee considered the importance of ensuring that our officers and other key executives have a sufficient stake in the company’s long-term future to align them with stockholders, and the retentive value of these awards. The compensation committee also viewed the 2013 Special Grant as a bridge to facilitate the transition to our new long-term performance equity plan (discussed above). The 2013 Special Grant was designed by the compensation committee in collaboration with the compensation committee’s independent compensation consultant and management and was structured in a manner intended to balance incentivizing performance and managing risk. Prior to making the grant, the compensation committee also reviewed with the compensation consultant the impact of the 2013 Special Grant on each officer’s total compensation and on our overall equity utilization rate.
The following is a summary of the performance vesting provisions of the 2013 Special Grant:
 	 	
•	One-half of the Revenue Units will vest upon our achievement of a specified amount of revenue coupled with a specified EBITDA margin on a trailing 12-month (“TTM”) basis within the five-year period from May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2018 (the “Primary Performance Period”), but only if our revenue and EBITDA margin on a TTM basis are at least 95% of these levels as of the end of any two complete fiscal quarters thereafter during the period from May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2019 (the “Secondary Performance Period”).	

•	The other half of the Revenue Units will vest upon our achievement of a higher specified amount of revenue coupled with the same specified EBITDA margin on a TTM basis within the Primary Performance Period, but only if our revenue and EBITDA margin on a TTM basis are at least 95% of these levels as of the end of any two complete fiscal quarters thereafter during the Secondary Performance Period.	

•	One-half of the EBITDA Units will vest upon our achievement of a specified amount of EBITDA on a TTM basis within the Primary Performance Period, but only if our EBITDA on a TTM basis is at least 95% of this level as of the end of any two complete fiscal quarters thereafter during the Secondary Performance Period.	

•	The other half of the EBITDA Units will vest upon our achievement of a higher specified amount of EBITDA on a TTM basis within the Primary Performance Period, but only if our EBITDA on a TTM basis is at least 95% of this level as of the end of any two complete fiscal quarters thereafter during the Secondary Performance Period.	

26

Stock Bonus Program
In order to foster a greater sense of company ownership for employees while reducing the company's cash compensation cost, in September 2011, our board of directors approved a stock bonus program under which eligible employees may receive a portion of their bonuses in the form of discounted shares of our common stock. This program is subject to annual funding approval by our board of directors and an annual cap on the number of shares that can be issued. For the program period ended January 31, 2014, the board of directors approved the issuance of up to 150,000 shares of common stock and a discount of 15% for awards under the program. On March 15, 2013, our board of directors authorized named executive officers to participate in the program for the first time, to the extent that shares remained available for awards following the enrollment of all other participants, to encourage our officers to continue to increase their stake in the company as well. Each of Messrs. Bodner, Robinson, Moriah, and Fante elected to participate. Shares issued to named executive officers in respect of the 15% discount will be subject to a one year vesting period. Shares will be issued in respect of the program period ended January 31, 2014 in the quarter ending July 31, 2014 and the number of shares to be issued to the named executive officers in respect of the 15% discount will not be determinable until such time. For the program period ending January 31, 2015, the board of directors approved the issuance of up to 125,000 shares of common stock and a discount of 15% for awards under the program, with named executive officers eligible to participate on the same basis as in the prior year.
Other Pay Elements
We do not currently make use of cash-based long-term incentive compensation arrangements, defined benefit plans, or deferred compensation plans. We provide a limited amount of perquisites to our executive officers, which vary from officer to officer and region to region and include:
 	 	
•	use of a company car or an annual car allowance, plus fuel reimbursement allowance;	
 	 	
•	an annual allowance for professional legal, tax, or financial advice;	
 	 	
•	payments for accrued vacation days (prior to separation from service); and	
 	 	
•	supplemental company-paid life insurance.	
Named executive officers in the United States also receive the same partial match of their 401(k) contributions as all other U.S. employees. Named executive officers in Israel receive company contributions to a retirement fund, a severance fund, and a continuing education fund, in each case, on the same basis as other Israeli employees. Named executive officers receive the same health insurance and company-paid group life and disability insurance offered to all other employees in the country in which the executive officer is employed.
Employment Agreements
Each of our named executive officers is party to a formal employment agreement with us. The terms of these agreements are summarized under “Executive Officer Severance Benefits and Change in Control Provisions—Provisions of Executive Officer Agreements” below.
Clawback Policy
Each of our named executive officers is subject to a clawback provision in his employment agreement that allows us to recoup from the officer, or cancel, all or a portion of the officer's incentive compensation (including bonuses and equity awards) for a particular year if we are required to restate our financial statements for that year due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the U.S. securities laws as a result of the officer's misconduct. The clawback applies from and after the year in which the employment agreement was first signed to performance-based awards made during the term of the agreement which were paid based on the results required to be restated. The amount to be recovered or forfeited is the amount by which the incentive compensation for the year in question exceeded the amount that would have been awarded had the financial statements originally been filed as restated.
Stock Ownership Guidelines and Other Policies
Our board of directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our named executive officers and non-employee directors who are compensated by us for their services. We believe these guidelines help to further align the interests of our executive officers and directors with those of our stockholders. The guidelines contain customary terms and conditions and establish the following target ownership levels:
 	 	
•	equity equal to five times salary for our Chief Executive Officer;	
 	 	
•	equity equal to three times salary for our other executive officers (reduced to one and a half times salary beginning at age 62); and	
 	 	
•	equity equal to three times annual cash retainer for non-employee directors.	

27

Until the target ownership levels are met, officers and directors subject to the guidelines are required to hold 50% of the after-tax shares acquired from either the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units or from the exercise of stock options. As a result of this requirement, there is no specified time frame for reaching the target ownership levels and no minimum holding periods once shares have been acquired. Other than pledged shares (as noted below), officers and directors subject to the guidelines are permitted to count towards the target ownership levels all shares of common stock held by such individual, regardless of source, including both vested and unvested stock awards, as well as the intrinsic value of vested stock options.

Our insider trading policy prohibits all personnel (including officers and directors) from short selling in our securities, from short-term trades in our securities (open market purchase and sale within three months), and from trading options in our securities. It also requires that any hedging transactions (for employees other than officers or directors) be pre-cleared by our legal department.

We have also adopted a policy prohibiting our officers and directors from engaging in hedging or significant pledging transactions in our securities. This policy supplements our insider trading policy and our director and officer stock ownership guidelines. A pledge is considered significant if it involves a number of shares equal to or exceeding the lesser of 1/2% of our outstanding equity securities or 10% of the Verint equity securities owned by the officer or director. Any equity securities that are pledged by an officer or director are not eligible to be counted toward such person's satisfaction of our stock ownership guidelines.
Our board of directors has adopted a policy generally precluding us from entering into any new plan, program, agreement, or arrangement providing for a 280G tax gross-up payment with any person or, subject to a limited exception relating to relocations, any other tax gross-up payments with officers.
Tax Implications
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a federal income tax deduction to publicly traded companies for compensation paid to certain executives above $1 million in any fiscal year unless such compensation satisfies the Internal Revenue Code's requirements for qualified performance-based compensation. To maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the compensation committee has not adopted a policy that all compensation must be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Compensation Committee Report
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement with management. Based on its review and discussions with management regarding such section of this proxy statement, the compensation committee recommended to the board of directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section be included in this proxy statement.

 	Compensation Committee:	
 	 	
 	Richard Nottenburg, Chair	
 	John Egan	
 	Howard Safir	
 	Earl Shanks	
The foregoing report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

28

Compensation Programs and Risk Assessment
In connection with our annual budgeting process and our annual performance review process, our executive management reviews our compensation policies and practices.  Our compensation policies and practices are relatively stable and tend not to change significantly from year to year, particularly below the executive level. We monitor the operation of these policies and procedures and believe that they have proven to be well-calibrated over time. We also believe that these policies and practices are comparable to those used by similarly situated companies in our industry and the companies with which we compete for talent. In conducting its review, management noted in particular the following aspects of our compensation policies and procedures:
 	 	
•	We use a combination of elements to achieve a balance between (1) fixed pay and variable pay, (2) time-based components and performance-based components, (3) quantitative targets and qualitative targets, and (4) short-term and long-term elements.	
 	 	
•	Variable compensation elements represent less than 25% of our total annual compensation expense and are broadly distributed among the employee base.	
 	 	
•	Bonus plans and performance-based equity plans are subject to maximum payouts and contain staged goals below target to permit payout opportunities for performance that approaches, but does not achieve, target.	
 	 	
•	The 2013 Special Grant contains a steady-state test to ensure that performance is sustained before vesting occurs.	
 	 	
•	Management maintains control over award templates and equity plan design and models the financial impact of design elements such as sales quotas and commissions before adoption.	
 	 	
•	Checks and balances in place for the processing of transactions and the calculation of performance levels and payout amounts.	
 	 	
•	Provisions in our commission plans allowing us to reduce, withhold, or offset commissions for transactions that do not meet specified minimum requirements, even after the commission has been paid.	
 	 	
•	Quarter-end guidelines to help ensure that sales transactions are handled in a consistent and ethical manner at the end of each reporting period.	
 	 	
•	Clawback provisions in our executive employment agreements and equity award agreements.	
Based on this review, management believes that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company.

29

Executive Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
The following table lists the annual compensation of our named executive officers for the years ended January 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.

Name and Principal Position	 	Year Ended January 31,	 	Salary
($)	 	Bonus
($)(1)	 	Stock Awards
($)(2)	 	Option Awards
($)	 	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)(3)	 	All Other Compensation
($)(4)	 	Total
($)	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner - President and Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Officer	 	2014	 	702,975	
 	 	—	
 	 	7,128,611	
 	 	—	
 	 	865,327	
 	 	62,973	
 	 	8,759,886	
 	 	
 	 	2013	 	685,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	3,941,673	
 	 	—	
 	 	709,279	
 	 	78,888	
 	 	5,414,840	
 	 	 	
 	 	2012	 	665,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	4,499,533	
 	 	—	
 	 	644,249	
 	 	35,036	
 	 	5,843,818	

Douglas Robinson - Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Officer	 	2014	 	394,575	
 	 	—	
 	 	1,565,450	
 	 	—	
 	 	304,158	
 	 	27,054	
 	 	2,291,237	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	2013	 	384,475	
 	 	—	
 	 	938,967	
 	 	—	
 	 	250,915	
 	 	38,207	
 	 	1,612,564	
 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	2012	 	373,250	
 	 	125,000	
 	 	1,159,982	
 	 	—	
 	 	223,922	
 	 	14,000	
 	 	1,896,154	

Elan Moriah - President, Enterprise Intelligence Solutions and Video and Situation Intelligence Solutions and Corporate Officer	 	2014	 	394,575	
 	 	—	
 	 	1,987,396	
 	 	—	
 	 	300,690	
 	 	15,805	
 	 	2,698,466	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	2013	 	384,475	
 	 	—	
 	 	942,641	
 	 	—	
 	 	245,835	
 	 	91,761	
 	 	1,664,712	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	2012	 	373,250	
 	 	125,000	
 	 	1,177,502	
 	 	—	
 	 	228,302	
 	 	16,262	
 	 	1,920,316	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Meir Sperling - Chief Strategy Officer and Corporate Officer (and former President, Communications and Cyber Intelligence Solutions)	 	2014	 	384,597	
 	(5)	—	
 	 	1,501,610	
 	 	—	
 	 	251,909	
 	(5)	102,260	
 	 	2,240,376	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	2013	 	349,586	
 	 	—	
 	 	876,182	
 	 	—	
 	 	261,430	
 	 	91,607	
 	 	1,578,805	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	2012	 	346,411	
 	 	100,000	
 	 	1,061,967	
 	 	—	
 	 	178,531	
 	 	90,236	
 	 	1,777,145	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Peter Fante - Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Officer	 	2014	 	361,988	
 	 	—	
 	 	1,416,775	
 	 	—	
 	 	234,359	
 	 	27,132	
 	 	2,040,254	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	2013	 	352,763	
 	 	—	
 	 	772,107	
 	 	—	
 	 	233,160	
 	 	21,888	
 	 	1,379,918	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	2012	 	342,500	
 	 	125,000	
 	 	971,435	
 	 	—	
 	 	174,614	
 	 	15,550	
 	 	1,629,099	

(1) Includes bonuses awarded outside the officer's regular annual bonus plan, including special bonuses such as the 2009 retention bonuses discussed in "—Narrative to Summary Compensation Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2014” below.
(2) Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of stock or option awards, as applicable, approved for the named executive officer in the applicable fiscal year computed in accordance with applicable accounting standards. For a further discussion of our accounting for equity compensation, see Note 15, “Stock-Based Compensation and Other Benefit Plans” to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014. For performance-based awards, the value shown in the table for the year ended January 31, 2014 is based on the assumed achievement of the target level (or probable level) of performance. See the “Grant Date Value of Performance Awards” table below for the aggregate grant date fair value of these performance awards assuming the highest level of performance had been achieved. Volatility in our stock price from year to year may impact the grant date fair value of our annual equity awards.
(3) Amount represents performance-based annual cash bonuses tied to the officer's pre-defined annual bonus plan. The amounts for Mr. Sperling reflect the impact of applicable exchange rates on the applicable payment dates or dates of Board approval. See also footnote 5 to this table below.
(4) See the table below for additional information on “All Other Compensation” amounts for the year ended January 31, 2014. “All Other Compensation” does not include premiums for group life, health, or disability insurance that is available generally

30

to all salaried employees in the country in which the executive officer is employed and do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our executive officers or directors.
(5) For the year ended January 31, 2014, Mr. Sperling received a salary of NIS 1,380,429 ($384,597 based on an average exchange rate from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014 of NIS 1=$0.2786) and was awarded a performance-based bonus of NIS 881,110 ($251,909 based on a January 31, 2014 exchange rate of NIS 1=0.2859), which will be paid during the year ended January 31, 2015. For purposes of this table, Mr. Sperling’s performance-based bonus has been translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect on the date of board approval.
Realized Pay Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
The following table sets forth the realized pay for our named executive officers for the year ended January 31, 2014, which we believe provides useful supplemental information to the “Summary Compensation Table” above, as it demonstrates the value of share awards that vested during the applicable year and stock options that were exercised during the applicable year, to more closely reflect each officer's "take home" pay for such year.

Name	Salary (1)	Bonus (2)	Realized Stock Awards (3)	Realized Option Awards (4)	All Other (1)	Total	
Dan Bodner	702,975	
 	865,327	
 	4,214,764	
 	608,970	
 	62,973	
 	6,455,009	
 	
Doug Robinson	394,575	
 	304,158	
 	982,498	
 	—	
 	27,054	
 	1,708,285	
 	
Elan Moriah	394,575	
 	300,690	
 	990,248	
 	236,030	
 	15,805	
 	1,937,348	
 	
Meir Sperling	384,597	
 	251,909	
 	904,195	
 	—	
 	102,260	
 	1,642,961	
 	
Peter Fante	361,988	
 	234,359	
 	795,559	
 	929	
 	27,132	
 	1,419,967	
 	
(1) As disclosed on the "Summary Compensation Table".
(2) Cash bonus and non-equity incentive plan compensation as disclosed in the "Summary Compensation Table".
(3) Realized stock awards means the value of all restricted stock units (time-based and performance-based) that vested during the year ended January 31, 2014 (measured as of the date of vesting).
(4) Realized option awards means the value of all stock options exercised during the year ended January 31, 2014 (measured as of the date of exercise).
Grant Date Value of Performance Awards
The following table sets forth the aggregate grant date fair value of the performance awards made to our named executive officers during the years ended January 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, assuming:
(a) the highest level of performance had been achieved (see the Maximum Possible Shares column), or
(b) the target level of performance (probable outcome) had been achieved (see the Target Shares column).
Fair value, in the case of the Maximum Possible Shares, is calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on the accounting grant date. Fair Value, in the case of the Target Shares, is calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on the dates the compensation committee originally approved the grants (April 12, 2011 ($35.04), April 26, 2012 ($30.60), and April 19, 2013 ($32.77)). The accounting grant date is generally the date on which the performance goal for the applicable award tranche has been both established and communicated, which date is not always the same as the date the compensation committee originally approved the grant. Award tranches are grouped by accounting grant date below.

Name	 	Original Date of Committee
Approval of Grant	 	Accounting Grant Date	 	Maximum
Possible Shares	 	Fair Value on Accounting Grant Date	 	Target
Shares	 	Fair Value on Original Date of Committee Approval of Grant	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner	 	4/19/2013 (1st tranche)	 	4/19/2013	 	31,930	
 	 	$	1,046,346	
 	 	25,544	
 	 	$	837,077	
 	
 	 	4/19/2013 (Special Equity all tranches)	 	4/19/2013	 	50,000	
 	 	1,638,500	
 	 	50,000	
 	 	1,638,500	
 	
 	 	4/26/2012 (2nd tranche)	 	3/14/2013	 	27,318	
 	 	973,887	
 	 	21,855	
 	 	668,763	
 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (3rd tranche)	 	3/14/2013	 	22,500	
 	 	802,125	
 	 	18,000	
 	 	630,720	

31

 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2014	 	131,748	
 	 	$	4,460,858	
 	 	115,399	
 	 	$	3,775,060	

 	 	4/26/2012 (1st tranche)	 	4/26/2012	 	43,710	
 	 	$	1,337,526	
 	 	21,855	
 	 	$	668,763	
 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (2nd tranche)	 	3/22/2012	 	36,000	
 	 	1,058,040	
 	 	18,000	
 	 	630,720	
 	
 	 	3/17/2010 (3rd tranche)	 	3/22/2012	 	50,194	
 	 	1,475,202	
 	 	25,097	
 	 	616,884	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2013	 	129,904	
 	 	$	3,870,768	
 	 	64,952	
 	 	$1,916,367	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (1st tranche)	 	4/12/2011	 	36,000	
 	 	$	1,261,440	
 	 	18,000	
 	 	$	630,720	
 	
 	 	3/17/2010 (2nd tranche)	 	3/25/2011	 	50,194	
 	 	1,760,806	
 	 	25,097	
 	 	616,884	
 	
 	 	3/4/2009 (3rd tranche)	 	3/25/2011	 	62,500	
 	 	2,192,500	
 	 	31,250	
 	 	129,688	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2012	 	148,694	
 	 	$	5,214,746	
 	 	74,347	
 	 	$1,377,292	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Douglas Robinson	 	4/19/2013 (1st tranche)	 	4/19/2013	 	6,136	
 	 	$	201,077	
 	 	4,909	
 	 	$	160,868	
 	
 	 	4/19/2013 (Special Equity All Tranches)	 	4/19/2013	 	12,000	
 	 	393,240	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	393,240	
 	
 	 	4/26/2012 (2nd tranche)	 	3/14/2013	 	6,646	
 	 	236,930	
 	 	5,317	
 	 	162,700	
 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (3rd tranche)	 	3/14/2013	 	5,000	
 	 	178,250	
 	 	4,000	
 	 	140,160	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2014	 	29,782	
 	 	$	1,009,497	
 	 	26,226	
 	 	$	856,968	

 	 	4/26/2012 (1st tranche)	 	4/26/2012	 	10,632	
 	 	$	325,339	
 	 	5,316	
 	 	$	162,670	
 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (2nd tranche)	 	3/22/2012	 	8,000	
 	 	235,120	
 	 	4,000	
 	 	140,160	
 	
 	 	3/17/2010 (3rd tranche)	 	3/22/2012	 	11,614	
 	 	341,335	
 	 	5,807	
 	 	142,736	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2013	 	30,246	
 	 	$	901,794	
 	 	15,123	
 	 	$	445,566	

 	 	4/12/2011 (1st tranche)	 	4/12/2011	 	8,000	
 	 	$	280,320	
 	 	4,000	
 	 	$	140,160	
 	
 	 	3/17/2010 (2nd tranche)	 	3/25/2011	 	11,612	
 	 	407,349	
 	 	5,806	
 	 	142,711	
 	
 	 	3/4/2009 (3rd tranche)	 	3/25/2011	 	22,558	
 	 	791,335	
 	 	11,279	
 	 	46,808	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2012	 	42,170	
 	 	$	1,479,004	
 	 	21,085	
 	 	$	329,679	

Elan Moriah	 	4/19/2013 (1st tranche)	 	4/19/2013	 	7,305	
 	 	$	239,385	
 	 	5,844	
 	 	$	191,508	
 	
 	 	4/19/2013 (Special Equity All Tranches)	 	4/19/2013	 	18,000	
 	 	589,860	
 	 	18,000	
 	 	589,860	
 	
 	 	4/26/2012 (2nd tranche)	 	3/14/2013	 	6,646	
 	 	236,930	
 	 	5,317	
 	 	162,700	
 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (3rd tranche)	 	3/14/2013	 	5,156	
 	 	183,811	
 	 	4,125	
 	 	144,540	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2014	 	37,107	
 	 	$	1,249,986	
 	 	33,286	
 	 	$1,088,608	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	4/26/2012 (1st tranche)	 	4/26/2012	 	10,632	
 	 	$	325,339	
 	 	5,316	
 	 	$	162,670	
 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (2nd tranche)	 	3/22/2012	 	8,250	
 	 	242,468	
 	 	4,125	
 	 	144,540	
 	
 	 	3/17/2010 (3rd tranche)	 	3/22/2012	 	11,614	
 	 	341,335	
 	 	5,807	
 	 	142,736	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2013	 	30,496	
 	 	$	909,142	
 	 	15,248	
 	 	$	449,946	

 	 	4/12/2011 (1st tranche)	 	4/12/2011	 	8,250	
 	 	$	289,080	
 	 	4,125	
 	 	$	144,540	
 	
 	 	3/17/2010 (2nd tranche)	 	3/25/2011	 	11,612	
 	 	407,349	
 	 	5,806	
 	 	142,711	

32

 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	3/4/2009 (3rd tranche)	 	3/25/2011	 	22,558	
 	 	791,335	
 	 	11,279	
 	 	46,808	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2012	 	42,420	
 	 	$	1,487,764	
 	 	21,210	
 	 	$334,059	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Meir Sperling	 	4/19/2013 (1st tranche)	 	4/19/2013	 	5,697	
 	 	$	186,691	
 	 	4,558	
 	 	$	149,366	
 	
 	 	4/19/2013 (Special Equity All Tranches)	 	4/19/2013	 	12,000	
 	 	393,240	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	393,240	
 	
 	 	4/26/2012 (2nd tranche)	 	3/14/2013	 	6,278	
 	 	223,811	
 	 	5,023	
 	 	153,704	
 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (3rd tranche)	 	3/14/2013	 	4,740	
 	 	168,981	
 	 	3,792	
 	 	132,872	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2014	 	28,715	
 	 	$	972,723	
 	 	25,373	
 	 	$829,182	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	4/26/2012 (1st tranche)	 	4/26/2012	 	10,046	
 	 	$	307,408	
 	 	5,023	
 	 	$	153,704	
 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (2nd tranche)	 	3/22/2012	 	7,584	
 	 	222,894	
 	 	3,792	
 	 	132,872	
 	
 	 	3/17/2010 (3rd tranche)	 	3/22/2012	 	10,200	
 	 	299,778	
 	 	5,100	
 	 	125,358	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2013	 	27,830	
 	 	$	830,080	
 	 	13,915	
 	 	$	411,934	

 	 	4/12/2011 (1st tranche)	 	4/12/2011	 	7,582	
 	 	$	265,673	
 	 	3,791	
 	 	$	132,837	
 	
 	 	3/17/2010 (2nd tranche)	 	3/25/2011	 	10,198	
 	 	357,746	
 	 	5,099	
 	 	125,333	
 	
 	 	5/20/2009 (3rd tranche)	 	3/25/2011	 	20,050	
 	 	703,354	
 	 	10,025	
 	 	78,195	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2012	 	37,830	
 	 	$	1,326,773	
 	 	18,915	
 	 	$	336,365	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Peter Fante	 	4/19/2013 (1st tranche)	 	4/19/2013	 	5,258	
 	 	$	172,305	
 	 	4,207	
 	 	$	137,863	
 	
 	 	4/19/2013 (Special Equity All Tranches)	 	4/19/2013	 	12,000	
 	 	393,240	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	393,240	
 	
 	 	4/26/2012 (2nd tranche)	 	3/14/2013	 	5,541	
 	 	197,537	
 	 	4,433	
 	 	135,650	
 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (3rd tranche)	 	3/14/2013	 	4,115	
 	 	$	146,700	
 	 	3,292	
 	 	$	115,352	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2014	 	26,914	
 	 	$	909,782	
 	 	23,932	
 	 	$	782,105	

 	 	4/26/2012 (1st tranche)	 	4/26/2012	 	8,866	
 	 	$	271,300	
 	 	4,433	
 	 	135,650	
 	
 	 	4/12/2011 (2nd tranche)	 	3/22/2012	 	6,584	
 	 	$	193,504	
 	 	3,292	
 	 	$	115,352	
 	
 	 	3/17/2010 (3rd tranche)	 	3/22/2012	 	9,032	
 	 	$	265,450	
 	 	4,516	
 	 	$	111,003	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2013	 	24,482	
 	 	$	730,254	
 	 	12,241	
 	 	$	362,005	

 	 	4/12/2011 (1st tranche)	 	4/12/2011	 	6,582	
 	 	$	230,633	
 	 	3,291	
 	 	115,317	
 	
 	 	3/17/2010 (2nd tranche)	 	3/25/2011	 	9,032	
 	 	316,843	
 	 	4,516	
 	 	111,003	
 	
 	 	3/4/2009 (3rd tranche)	 	3/25/2011	 	20,050	
 	 	$	703,354	
 	 	10,025	
 	 	$	41,604	
 	
 	 	 	 	Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2012	 	35,664	
 	 	$	1,250,830	
 	 	17,832	
 	 	$	267,924	

33

All Other Compensation Table

Name	 	Employer Retirement Contrib.
($)	 	Severance Fund Contrib.
($)	 	Study Fund Contrib.
($)	 	Car Allowance or Cost of Company Car Plus Fuel Allowance
($)	 	Professional Advice Allowance
($)	 	Accrued Vacation Payout
($) (2)	 	Statutory Recreation Payment
($)	 	Supp. Life Insurance
($)	 	Total
($)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner	 	2,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	13,483	
 	 	40,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	7,490	
 	 	62,973	
 	
Douglas Robinson	 	2,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	10,000	
 	 	3,054	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	27,054	
 	
Elan Moriah	 	2,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	13,805	
 	 	—	
 	 	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	15,805	
 	
Meir Sperling (1)	 	21,426	
 	 	32,189	
 	 	28,845	
 	 	18,966	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	834	
 	 	—	
 	 	102,260	
 	
Peter Fante	 	2,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	13,132	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	27,132	
 	
(1) For the year ended January 31, 2014, Mr. Sperling received a company contribution to his retirement fund of NIS 76,903 ($21,426), to his severance fund of NIS 115,537 ($32,189), to his study fund of NIS 103,532 ($28,845), use of a company car plus a fuel reimbursement allowance which cost us NIS 68,076 ($18,966) for the period, and a statutory recreation payment of NIS 2,992 ($834). For purposes of this table, all amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars based on an average exchange rate from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014 of NIS 1=$0.2786.
(2) During the year ended January 31, 2014, each of Messrs. Robinson and Fante elected to participate in a program available to all U.S. employees by which a portion of the employee's accrued vacation is monetized and the after-tax amount is donated to a children's charity as part of Verint's community relations program. The table above reflects the pre-tax amount that was included in the officer's compensation prior to such donation.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
The following table sets forth information concerning equity and other plan-based grants to our named executive officers during the year ended January 31, 2014. The table also contains information for awards originally approved in prior years to the extent that one or more of the performance goals for the applicable tranche of such awards was established in the year ended January 31, 2014 (indicating that the accounting grant date for such tranche was in the year ended January 31, 2014).

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards	 	Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards	 	 	 	 	
Name	 	Type of Award	 	Original Date of Committee Approval of Grant	 	Accounting Grant Date	 	Threshold
($) (1)	 	Target
($)	 	Max
($)	 	Threshold
(#) (10)	 	Target
(#)	 	Max
(#)	 	All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units
(#)	 	 Accounting Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
($) (2)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner	 	RSU (Time-vested grants) (3)	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	98,633	
 	 	3,232,203	
 	
 	 	RSU (Special Equity Performance-vested grant) (4)	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	 	50,000	
 	 	N/A	
 	 	 	 	1,638,500	
 	
 	 	RSU (Performance-vested grant) (5) (6) (7)	 	4/19/2013	 	N/A	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	 	24,544	
 	 	N/A	
 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/19/2013	 	3/20/2014	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	6,136	
 	 	24,544	
 	 	36,816	
 	 	 	 	1,156,759	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	12,272	
 	 	24,544	
 	 	30,680	
 	 	 	 	804,307	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/26/2012	 	3/14/2013	(9)	

 	

 	 	10,927	
 	 	21,855	
 	 	27,318	

 	 	779,131	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/12/2011	 	3/14/2013	(9)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	9,000	
 	 	18,000	
 	 	22,500	
 	 	—	
 	 	641,700	
 	
 	 	Annual Bonus for Year Ended 1/31/14	 	N/A	 	N/A	 	375,360	
 	 	816,000	
 	 	1,142,400	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
Douglas Robinson	 	RSU (Time-vested grants) (3)	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	20,726	
 	 	679,191	
 	
 	 	RSU (Special Equity Performance-vested grant) (4)	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	N/A	
 	 	 	 	393,240	
 	
 	 	RSU (Performance-vested grant) (5) (6) (7)	 	4/19/2013	 	N/A	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	 	4,909	
 	 	N/A	
 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/19/2013	 	3/20/2014	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	1,227	
 	 	4,909	
 	 	7,363	
 	 	 	 	 231,361	

34

 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	2,454	
 	 	4,909	
 	 	6,136	
 	 	 	 	160,868	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/26/2012	 	3/14/2013	(9)	

 	

 	 	2,658	
 	 	5,317	
 	 	6,646	

 	 	189,551	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/12/2011	 	3/14/2013	(9)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	2,000	
 	 	4,000	
 	 	5,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	142,600	
 	
 	 	Annual Bonus for Year Ended 1/31/14	 	N/A	 	N/A	 	132,940	
 	 	289,000	
 	 	404,600	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
Elan Moriah	 	RSU (Time-vested grants) (3)	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	26,531	
 	 	869,421	
 	
 	 	RSU (Special Equity Performance-vested grant) (4)	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	 	18,000	
 	 	N/A	
 	 	 	 	589,860	
 	
 	 	RSU (Performance-vested grant) (5) (6) (7)	 	4/19/2013	 	N/A	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	 	5,844	
 	 	N/A	
 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/19/2013	 	3/20/2014	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	1,461	
 	 	5,844	
 	 	8,766	
 	 	 	 	 275,428	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	2,922	
 	 	5,844	
 	 	7,305	
 	 	 	 	191,508	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/26/2012	 	3/14/2013	(9)	

 	

 	 	2,658	
 	 	5,317	
 	 	6,646	

 	 	189,551	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/12/2011	 	3/14/2013	(9)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	2,063	
 	 	4,125	
 	 	5,156	
 	 	—	
 	 	147,056	
 	
 	 	Annual Bonus for Year Ended 1/31/14	 	N/A	 	N/A	 	132,940	
 	 	289,000	
 	 	404,600	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
Meir Sperling	 	RSU (Time-vested grants) (3)	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	19,675	
 	 	644,750	
 	
 	 	RSU (Special Equity Performance-vested grant) (4)	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	N/A	
 	 	 	 	393,240	
 	
 	 	RSU (Performance-vested grant) (5) (6) (7)	 	4/19/2013	 	N/A	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	 	4,558	
 	 	N/A	
 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/19/2013	 	3/20/2014	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	1,139	
 	 	4,558	
 	 	6,837	
 	 	 	 	 214,819	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	2,279	
 	 	4,558	
 	 	5,697	
 	 	 	 	149,366	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/26/2012	 	3/14/2013	(9)	

 	

 	 	2,511	
 	 	5,023	
 	 	6,278	

 	 	179,070	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/12/2011	 	3/14/2013	(9)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	1,896	
 	 	3,792	
 	 	4,740	
 	 	—	
 	 	135,185	
 	
 	 	Annual Bonus for Year Ended 1/31/14 (8)	 	N/A	 	N/A	 	105,248	
 	 	228,800	
 	 	320,320	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
Peter Fante	 	RSU (Time-vested grants) (3)	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	18,623	
 	 	610,276	
 	
 	 	RSU (Special Equity Performance-vested grant) (4)	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	N/A	
 	 	 	 	393,240	
 	
 	 	RSU (Performance-vested grant) (5) (6) (7)	 	4/19/2013	 	N/A	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	 	4,208	
 	 	N/A	
 	 	 	 	N/A	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/19/2013	 	3/20/2014	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 1,051	
 	 	4,207	
 	 	6,310	
 	 	 	 	 198,276	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/19/2013	 	4/19/2013	(9)	 	 	 	 	 	 	2,103	
 	 	4,207	
 	 	5,258	
 	 	 	 	137,863	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/26/2012	 	3/14/2013	(9)	

 	

 	 	2,216	
 	 	4,433	
 	 	5,541	

 	 	158,036	
 	
 	 	 	 	4/12/2011	 	3/14/2013	(9)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	1,646	
 	 	3,292	
 	 	4,115	
 	 	—	
 	 	117,360	
 	
 	 	Annual Bonus for Year Ended 1/31/14	 	N/A	 	N/A	 	101,660	
 	 	221,000	
 	 	309,400	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
(1) The threshold column corresponds to the minimum bonus payable to the executive officer assuming that minimum financial performance goals are achieved and assuming that MBO achievement is zero. If minimum financial performance goals are not achieved and MBO achievement is zero, the bonus payable to the executive officer would be zero.
(2) The accounting grant date fair value of equity awards is based on the target number of shares and calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the accounting grant date, which is not always the same as the date the compensation committee originally approved the grant. The accounting grant date is generally the date on which the performance goal for the applicable award tranche has been both established and communicated. For a further discussion of our accounting for equity compensation, see Note 15, “Stock-Based Compensation and Other Benefit Plans” to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014. See the "Grant Date Value of Performance Awards" table above for information about the grant date values of the performance-vested equity awards included in this table calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the dates the compensation committee originally approved the grants.
(3) The April 19, 2013 time-based awards vest 1/3 on April 4, 2014, 1/3 on April 4, 2015, and 1/3 on April 4, 2016.
(4) The April 19, 2013 special grant of performance-based RSUs vests upon the achievement of specified revenue and EBITDA targets (set by the compensation committee upon grant) for the period from May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2019. For all

35

tranches, the table shows the number of shares granted in the column entitled “Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested” because the specified revenue and EBITDA targets were not met as of January 31, 2014. For a full description of the 2013 Special Grant and associated metrics, see “—2013 Special Grant” above.
(5) The April 19, 2013 regular annual performance awards vest 1/3 upon the compensation committee's determination of our achievement of specified revenue targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014, but no earlier than April 4, 2014, 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015, but no earlier than April 4, 2015, and 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2015 through January 31, 2016, but no earlier than April 4, 2016.
(6) The April 26, 2012 performance awards vest 1/3 upon the compensation committee's determination of our achievement of specified revenue targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013, but no earlier than April 10, 2013, 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014, but no earlier than April 10, 2014, and 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015, but no earlier than April 10, 2015.
(7) The April 12, 2011 performance awards vest 1/3 upon the compensation committee’s determination of our achievement of specified revenue targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2011 through January 31, 2012, but no earlier than June 15, 2012, 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013, but no earlier than June 15, 2013, and 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014, but no earlier than June 15, 2014.
(8) On March 14, 2013, the compensation committee approved threshold, target, and maximum bonus awards for Mr. Sperling of NIS 673,600, NIS 842,000, and NIS 1,178,800 respectively ($105,248, $228,800, and $320,320, based on a March 12, 2013 exchange rate of NIS1=$0.2718).
(9) Each performance award contains three equal tranches which vest based on three separate performance periods. Dates correspond to the accounting grant date applicable to the first, second, and third tranches, respectively. The accounting grant date is generally the date on which the performance goal for the applicable award tranche has been both established and communicated. Tranches for which performance goals have not yet been established do not yet have an accounting grant date.
(10) Represents the threshold number of shares that were available to be earned in the applicable performance period. Tranches for which performance goals have not yet been established do not yet have a threshold award level, but all awards are subject to a maximum payout level of 200% or less. If the minimum performance goal is not achieved in any performance period, no shares are earned for that period.

36

The following table summarizes the actual number of shares earned with respect to the performance equity awards listed in the table above for each of the performance periods that have already been completed.

Performance Grant Approved April 12, 2011	
Name	 	Actual Shares Earned for YE 1/31/12 Performance Period	 	Actual Shares Earned for YE 1/31/13 Performance Period	 	Actual Shares Earned for YE 1/31/14 Performance Period	
Dan Bodner	 	18,412	
 	 	14,834	
 	 	19,445	
 	
Douglas Robinson	 	4,091	
 	 	3,296	
 	 	4,321	
 	
Elan Moriah	 	4,219	
 	 	3,399	
 	 	4,456	
 	
Meir Sperling	 	3,877	
 	 	3,125	
 	 	4,096	
 	
Peter Fante	 	3,366	
 	 	2,713	
 	 	3,556	

Performance Grant Approved April 26, 2012	
Name	 	 	 	Actual Shares Earned for YE 1/31/13 Performance Period	 	Actual Shares Earned for YE 1/31/14 Performance Period	
Dan Bodner	 	 	 	20,274	
 	 	24,095	
 	
Douglas Robinson	 	 	 	4,931	
 	 	5,862	
 	
Elan Moriah	 	 	 	4,931	
 	 	5,862	
 	
Meir Sperling	 	 	 	4,659	
 	 	5,538	
 	
Peter Fante	 	 	 	4,112	
 	 	4,887	

Regular Annual Performance Grant Approved April 19, 2013	
Name	 	 	 	 	 	Actual Shares Earned for YE 1/31/14 Performance Period	
Dan Bodner	 	 	 	 	 	27,060	
 	
Douglas Robinson	 	 	 	 	 	5,412	
 	
Elan Moriah	 	 	 	 	 	6,443	
 	
Meir Sperling	 	 	 	 	 	5,025	
 	
Peter Fante	 	 	 	 	 	4,638	
 	
Further Information Regarding Summary Compensation Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2014 and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
As of the date of this proxy statement, each of our named executive officers is party to an employment agreement with us. Each agreement provides for certain severance payments and benefits, including in connection with a change in control. See “—Executive Officer Severance Benefits and Change in Control Provisions” below for a discussion of these severance and change in control benefits, as well as a description of the restrictive covenants and clawback provisions contained in such agreements.
The agreements with our U.S. named executive officers generally provide for an initial term of two years, followed by automatic one-year renewals (unless terminated by either party in accordance with the agreement and subject to required notice). The agreements with our non-U.S. named executive officers do not provide for a fixed term. Termination of the agreements by us constitutes good reason for resignation under the agreements with our U.S. named executive officers other than Mr. Bodner, and constitutes a termination without cause under the agreement with Mr. Bodner.
Narrative to Summary Compensation Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
As discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, each named executive officer's employment agreement provides for an annual base salary, target bonus, and certain perquisites. Although target bonuses are specified in each employment agreement, bonuses are not guaranteed and are paid based on the achievement of performance goals. As of January 31, 2014, the target bonuses specified by the employment agreements were as follows: $600,000 (for Mr. Bodner),

37

$219,000 (for Mr. Robinson), $167,500 (for Mr. Fante), $219,000 (for Mr. Moriah), and NIS 638,000 (for Mr. Sperling). Other than in the case of Mr. Bodner, whose employment agreement was signed in February 2010, all of the other executive officers entered into new or amended employment agreements in July 2011, which updated their contractual target bonuses to match the target bonuses established for them by the compensation committee in March 2011. As of January 31, 2014, the target bonus for Mr. Sperling corresponded to $240,728 based on an exchange rate of NIS 1=$0.2859 on such date. Historically, the target bonuses for each executive officer established by the compensation committee as part of its annual compensation review process has equaled or exceeded the target bonus specified in the executive officer’s employment agreement (if any) as well as the target bonus from the previous year.
Due to the protracted length of the extended filing delay period we experienced from 2006 to 2010, we placed special emphasis on retention in our compensation philosophy during that period. In 2009, we entered into retention award letter agreements with each of our named executive officers other than Mr. Bodner, which provided for the payment of cash bonuses over a two-year period ending in April 2011. At Mr. Bodner's request, the compensation committee did not approve a 2009 retention bonus for him. The 2009 retention bonus program was designed in consultation with the compensation committee's independent compensation consultant at such time. The first half of the 2009 retention bonuses was earned and paid in April 2010 and the second half was earned and paid in April 2011.
Narrative to All Other Compensation Table
We provide a limited amount of perquisites to our named executive officers, which vary from officer to officer depending on the terms of their employment agreements, local policy, and historical practice. Each of the executive officers is entitled to use of a company car or an annual car allowance. Mr. Sperling is also entitled to an annual allowance for fuel reimbursement. Messrs. Bodner, Robinson, and Fante are entitled to an annual allowance for legal, tax, or accounting advice. In some years, Mr. Sperling has received reimbursement of a limited amount of legal or tax advice as agreed by us on a case by case basis in connection with proposed modifications of his employment arrangements. All executive officers receive the same health insurance and company-paid group life and disability insurance offered to all other employees in the country in which the executive officer is employed. In addition, Mr. Bodner has historically received a supplemental company-paid life insurance policy. Executive officers in the U.S. receive the same partial match of their 401(k) contributions as all other U.S. employees, up to a maximum company contribution of $2,000 per year.
Like all Israeli employees, under Israeli law, Mr. Sperling is entitled to severance pay equal to one month’s salary for each year of employment upon termination without cause (as defined in the Israel Severance Pay Law). To satisfy this requirement, for all Israeli employees, including Mr. Sperling, we make contributions on behalf of the employee to a severance fund. This severance fund is often part of a larger provident fund which also includes a retirement fund and in some cases an insurance component. Each employee can elect to contribute an amount equal to between 5% and 7% of his or her monthly salary to the retirement fund. We contribute an amount equal to between 5% and 7.5% of the employee’s monthly salary to the retirement fund (or other provident fund) plus an additional amount equal to 8.33% of the employee’s monthly salary to the severance fund. The employee is not required to contribute anything towards the severance fund. Our contributions are incremental to the employee’s base salary and, except as noted below, are paid by us directly to the third-party plan administrator. Applicable tax law permits allocations made by the employer to the retirement fund to be made on a tax-free basis up to a limit set by applicable Israeli tax regulations. Under local Israeli company policy, the employee may request that any company contributions in excess of this limit be made directly to him or her rather than being placed in the retirement fund. For executives like Mr. Sperling, if the amount in the severance fund is insufficient to cover the required statutory payment under Israeli labor law at the time of a termination event, we are obligated to supplement the amounts in the severance fund.
In addition, all Israeli employees, including Mr. Sperling, are also entitled to participate in a continuing education fund, often referred to as a study fund. The continuing education fund is a savings fund from which the employee can withdraw on a tax-free basis for any purpose after six years, irrespective of his or her employment status with us. Each month, eligible employees contribute 2.5%, and we contribute 7.5%, of the employee’s base salary to the study fund. Applicable tax law permits a portion of the company contributions to the study fund to be made tax-free. Under local Israeli company policy, the employee may request that any company contributions in excess of this limit be made directly to him or her rather than being placed in the fund. Our contributions are incremental to the employee’s base salary and, except as noted above, are paid by us directly to the third-party plan administrator. Under applicable Israeli law, each employee who has completed at least one year of service is paid a small annual amount for recreation based on the employee’s tenure and a per-diem rate published by the Israeli government. Under local Israeli company policy, our Israeli employees are also entitled to receive a cash payment in exchange for vacation days in accordance with the terms of the policy.

38

Outstanding Equity Awards at January 31, 2014
The following table sets forth information regarding various equity awards held by our named executive officers as of January 31, 2014. The market value of all awards is based on the closing price of our common stock as of the last trading day in the year ended January 31, 2014 ($45.44 on January 31, 2014).

 	 	 	Option Awards	 	Stock Awards	
Name	Date of Committee Approval of Grant	 	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Exercisable	 	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Unexercisable	 	Option Exercise Price
($)	 	Option Expiration Date	 	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#) (9)	 	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)	 	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#) (10)	 	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner	12/9/2004	(1)	80,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	35.11	
 	 	12/9/2014	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	1/11/2006	(1)	88,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	34.40	
 	 	1/11/2016	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/12/2011	(2)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	18,000	
 	 	817,920	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/12/2011	(3)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	19,445	
 	 	883,581	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/26/2012	(4)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	43,710	
 	 	1,986,182	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/26/2012	(5)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	24,095	
 	 	1,094,877	
 	 	21,855	
 	 	993,091	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(6)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	98,633	
 	 	4,481,884	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(7)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	50,000	
 	 	2,272,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(8)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	27,060	
 	 	1,229,606	
 	 	49,088	
 	 	2,230,559	
 	
Douglas Robinson	4/12/2011	(2)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	4,000	
 	 	181,760	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/12/2011	(3)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	4,321	
 	 	196,346	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/26/2012	(4)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	10,634	
 	 	483,209	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/26/2012	(5)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	5,862	
 	 	266,369	
 	 	5,317	
 	 	241,604	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(6)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	20,726	
 	 	941,789	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(7)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	545,280	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(8)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	5,412	
 	 	245,921	
 	 	9,818	
 	 	446,130	
 	
Elan Moriah	12/9/2004	(1)	25,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	35.11	
 	 	12/9/2014	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	1/11/2006	(1)	20,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	34.40	
 	 	1/11/2016	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/12/2011	(2)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	4,125	
 	 	187,440	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/12/2011	(3)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	4,456	
 	 	202,481	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/26/2012	(4)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	10,634	
 	 	483,209	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/26/2012	(5)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	5,862	
 	 	266,369	
 	 	5,317	
 	 	241,604	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(6)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	26,531	
 	 	1,205,569	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(7)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	18,000	
 	 	817,920	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(8)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	6,443	
 	 	292,770	
 	 	11,688	
 	 	531,103	
 	
Meir Sperling	12/9/2004	(1)	25,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	35.11	
 	 	12/9/2014	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	1/11/2006	(1)	20,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	34.40	
 	 	1/11/2016	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/12/2011	(2)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	3,792	
 	 	172,308	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/12/2011	(3)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	4,096	
 	 	186,122	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/26/2012	(4)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	10,047	
 	 	456,536	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/26/2012	(5)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	5,538	
 	 	251,647	
 	 	5,024	
 	 	228,291	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(6)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	19,675	
 	 	894,032	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(7)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	545,280	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(8)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	5,025	
 	 	228,336	
 	 	9,116	
 	 	414,231	
 	
Peter Fante	12/9/2004	(1)	20,000	
 	 	—	
 	 	35.11	
 	 	12/9/2014	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	

39

 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	4/12/2011	(2)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	3,292	
 	 	149,588	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/12/2011	(3)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	3,556	
 	 	161,585	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/26/2012	(4)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	8,867	
 	 	402,916	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/26/2012	(5)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	4,887	
 	 	222,065	
 	 	4,434	
 	 	201,481	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(6)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	18,623	
 	 	846,229	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(7)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	12,000	
 	 	545,280	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
 	4/19/2013	(8)	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	4,638	
 	 	210,751	
 	 	8,415	
 	 	382,378	
 	
(1) This award was fully vested at January 31, 2014.
(2) The April 12, 2011 time-based awards vest 1/3 on June 15, 2012, 1/3 on June 15, 2013, and 1/3 on June 15, 2014.
(3) The April 12, 2011 performance awards vest 1/3 upon the compensation committee’s determination of our achievement of specified revenue targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2011 through January 31, 2012, but no earlier than June 15, 2012, 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013, but no earlier than June 15, 2013, and 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014, but no earlier than June 15, 2014. The table excludes shares eligible to be earned in excess of the target level based on the overachievement of the applicable performance goals except with respect to tranches for which the performance period had been completed as of January 31, 2014 (and the number of such overachievement shares could be calculated). For tranches corresponding to the January 31, 2014 performance period, the table shows the number of shares ultimately earned in the column entitled “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” because the performance period had been completed as of January 31, 2014, however, the determination of the number of shares earned (and the vesting thereof) did not occur until after the conclusion of the performance period. See “—Grant Date Value of Performance Awards” above and “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended January 31, 2014” above for more information.
(4) The April 26, 2012 time-based awards vest 1/3 on April 10, 2013, 1/3 on April 10, 2014, and 1/3 on April 10, 2015.
(5) The April 26, 2012 performance awards vest 1/3 upon the compensation committee's determination of our achievement of specified revenue targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013, but no earlier than April 10, 2013, 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014, but no earlier than April 10, 2014, and 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015, but no earlier than April 10, 2015. The table excludes shares eligible to be earned in excess of the target level based on the overachievement of the applicable performance goals except with respect to tranches for which the performance period had been completed as of January 31, 2014 (and the number of such overachievement shares could be calculated). For tranches corresponding to the January 31, 2014 performance period, the table shows the number of shares ultimately earned in the column entitled “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” because the performance period had been completed as of January 31, 2014, however, the determination of the number of shares earned (and the vesting thereof) did not occur until after the conclusion of the performance period. See “—Grant Date Value of Performance Awards” above and “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended January 31, 2014” above for more information.
(6) The April 19, 2013 time-based awards vest 1/3 on April 4, 2014, 1/3 on April 4, 2015, and 1/3 on April 4, 2016.
(7) The April 19, 2013 special grant of performance-based RSUs vests upon the achievement of specified revenue and EBITDA targets (set by the compensation committee upon grant) for the period from May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2019. For all tranches, the table shows the number of shares granted in the column entitled “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” because the specified revenue and EBITDA targets were not met as of January 31, 2014. For a full description of the 2013 Special Grant and associated metrics, see “—2013 Special Grant” above.
(8) The April 19, 2013 regular annual performance awards vest 1/3 upon the compensation committee's determination of our achievement of specified revenue targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014, but no earlier than April 4, 2014, 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015, but no earlier than April 4, 2015, and 1/3 upon the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2015 through January 31, 2016, but no earlier than April 4, 2016. The table excludes shares eligible to be earned in excess of the target level based on the overachievement of the applicable performance goals except with respect to tranches for which the performance period had been completed as of January 31, 2014 (and the number of such overachievement shares could be calculated). For tranches corresponding to the January 31, 2014 performance period, the table shows the number of shares ultimately earned in the column entitled “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” because the performance period had been completed as of January 31, 2014, however, the determination of the number of shares earned (and the vesting thereof) did

40

not occur until after the conclusion of the performance period. See “—Grant Date Value of Performance Awards” above and “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended January 31, 2014” above for more information.
(9) Includes time-based awards and performance-based awards for which the performance goals had been established by the compensation committee as of January 31, 2014.
(10) Includes performance-based awards for which the performance goals had not yet been established by the compensation committee as of January 31, 2014.

Option Exercises and Stock Vesting During the Year Ended January 31, 2014
The following table sets forth information regarding option exercises and stock award vestings for our named executive officers during the year ended January 31, 2014. The value realized on exercise of stock options is calculated by multiplying the number of options being exercised by the spread between the exercise price and the market price of our common stock at the time of exercise. The value of stock awards realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares vesting by the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date. See “—Outstanding Equity Awards at January 31, 2014” above for the vesting schedule of outstanding awards.

 	 	Option Awards	 	Stock Awards	
Name	 	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise
(#)	 	Value Realized on Exercise
($)	 	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
(#)	 	Value Realized on Vesting
($)	
Dan Bodner	 	43,082	
 	 	608,970	
 	 	120,743	
 	 	4,214,764	
 	
Douglas Robinson	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	28,135	
 	 	982,498	
 	
Elan Moriah	 	18,750	
 	 	236,030	
 	 	28,363	
 	 	990,248	
 	
Meir Sperling	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	25,902	
 	 	904,195	
 	
Peter Fante	 	67	
 	 	929	
 	 	22,787	
 	 	795,559	
 	
Executive Officer Severance Benefits and Change in Control Provisions
As of the date of this proxy statement, each of our named executive officers is party to an employment agreement with us. The following is a summary of the severance and change in control provisions of these employment agreements as of the date of this proxy statement. The following also summarizes related benefits that our non-U.S. named executive officers may be entitled to under local law. This is not a complete summary of the named executive officer employment agreements.
Provisions of Executive Officer Agreements
Each of the employment agreements with our named executive officers provides for an annual base salary and a performance-based bonus target.
Severance or Advance Notice Not in Connection with a Change in Control
In the event of an involuntary termination of employment (a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason) not in connection with a change in control, the executive officers are, subject to their execution of a release and continued compliance with the restrictive covenants described below, entitled to specified amounts of severance and/or minimum amounts of advance notice.
Our U.S. executive officers, other than Mr. Bodner, are entitled to 12 months of severance consisting of base salary and reimbursement of health insurance premiums.
Mr. Bodner is entitled to a 60 day advance notice period (during which all of his regular compensation and benefits would be payable) and 18 months of severance consisting of base salary, reimbursement of health insurance premiums, continuation of his professional advice allowance, and access to his company-leased vehicle.
Mr. Sperling is entitled to a 90 day advance notice period (during which all of his regular compensation and benefits would be payable), which subsumes the minimum notice period required under Israeli law for all Israeli employees, and 12 months of severance consisting of base salary and reimbursement of health insurance premiums.
As discussed under “—Narrative to ‘All Other Compensation’ Table” above, Mr. Sperling is also entitled to severance pay equal to one month’s salary for each year of employment upon termination without cause (as defined in the Israel Severance

41

Pay Law) under Israeli law applicable to all Israeli employees. We make payments into a severance fund to secure this severance obligation during the course of Mr. Sperling’s employment and, unless there is a shortfall as described under “— Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (CIC)” below, we are not responsible for any payments at the time of a qualifying termination. As a result, these amounts are included in the table entitled “Summary Compensation Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2014” above, but not in the table entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (CIC)” below. However, the table entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (CIC)” below does include any additional amount of severance we are responsible for in excess of the balance in the severance fund at the time of a qualifying termination (in the event there is a shortfall) based on the legally mandated formula described above.
Mr. Sperling is also entitled to a resettlement grant in an amount equal to his base salary plus regular benefits for 10 months, plus 1 month for each full year of service beginning after September 1, 2010 and a pro-rated month for the applicable portion of the final year of service. This resettlement grant as well as the release of Mr. Sperling’s severance fund discussed above (including any true-up required at the time of a qualifying termination) is also payable in the event of Mr. Sperling’s resignation, whether or not for good reason, but not in the event of a termination for cause.
In addition, in the event of an involuntary termination, each executive officer, other than Mr. Bodner, is entitled to a pro-rated portion of his annual bonus for such year plus an amount equal to 100% of his average annual bonus measured over the last three years. Mr. Bodner’s agreement provides for a pro-rated portion of his annual bonus for such year plus an amount equal to 150% of his target bonus.
Severance in Connection with a Change in Control
In the event of a termination of employment in connection with a change in control, in lieu of the salary severance and bonus severance described above, each of the executive officers is entitled to enhanced cash severance equal to the sum of 1.5 times base salary and target bonus, plus a pro-rated target bonus for the year of termination, or in the case of Mr. Bodner, 2.5 times the sum of base salary and target bonus, plus a pro-rated target bonus for the year of termination. As noted above, Mr. Sperling is also entitled to the resettlement grant and release of his severance fund in the event of any termination or resignation other than a termination for cause. Other payments or benefits triggered by a termination event, such as advance notice or reimbursement of health insurance premiums, would continue to apply on the same basis as described in the preceding section.
Equity
Other than in the case of Mr. Bodner, no equity acceleration is provided in the case of an involuntary termination not in connection with a change in control. In the event of an involuntary termination of employment in connection with a change in control, each of the employment agreements provides for acceleration of all unvested equity awards. Each of the agreements also provides that all of the executive officer’s outstanding equity awards will become fully vested if not assumed in connection with a change in control.
Other Provisions
Each of the employment agreements provides for customary restrictive covenants, with a covenant period ranging from 12 to 24 months, including a non-compete, a non-solicitation of customers and employees, and an indefinite non-disclosure provision. Each agreement also contains a clawback provision which allows us to recoup from the officer, or cancel, a portion of the officer’s incentive compensation (including bonuses and equity awards) for a particular year if we are required to restate our financial statements for that year due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the U.S. securities laws as a result of the officer’s misconduct. The clawback applies from and after the year in which the employment agreement was first signed to performance-based awards made during the term of the agreement which were paid based on the results required to be restated. The amount to be recovered or forfeited is the amount by which the incentive compensation in the year in question exceeded the amount that would have been awarded had the financial statements originally been filed as restated. Each of our U.S. executive officers is also entitled to a gross-up for any excise taxes he may become subject to in connection with a change in control. The terms “cause”, “good reason”, and “change in control” are defined in the forms of employment agreements.

42

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (CIC)
The table below outlines the potential payments and benefits that would have become payable by us to our named executive officers in the event of certain triggering events, assuming that the relevant event occurred on January 31, 2014. In reviewing the table, please note the following:
 	 	
•	The table does not include amounts that would be payable by third parties where we have no continuing liability at the time of the triggering event, such as amounts payable under private insurance policies, government insurance such as social security or national insurance, or 401(k) or similar defined contribution retirement plans. As a result, the table does not reflect amounts payable to Mr. Sperling under the applicable local company retirement plan or retirement fund, for which we have no liability at the time of payment.	
 	 	
•	Except as noted in the following bullet, the table does not include payments or benefits that are available generally to all salaried employees in the country in which the executive officer is employed and do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our executive officers or directors, such as short-term disability payments or payment for accrued but unused vacation.	
 	 	
•	The table includes all severance or notice payments for which we are financially responsible at the time of the triggering event, even if such payments are available generally to all salaried employees in the country in which the executive officer is employed and do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our executive officers or directors.	
 	 	
•	With respect to Mr. Sperling’s severance fund, the table includes the difference between the amount that would have been owed to Mr. Sperling under applicable Israeli labor law in the event of an involuntary termination and the amount in his severance fund at January 31, 2014, since we would be responsible for such shortfall.	
 	 	
•	The value of equity awards in the table below is based on the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day in the year ended January 31, 2014 ($45.44 on January 31, 2014).	
 	 	
•	The table assumes that in connection with a change in control in which the executive officer is not terminated, all of such executive officer’s unvested equity is assumed (and is therefore not accelerated).	
 	 	
•	The table assumes that in the event an executive officer becomes disabled, he becomes eligible for benefits under our long-term disability insurance within six months of the occurrence of such disability.	
 	 	
•	Except with respect to tax gross-up amounts to which the executive officers may be entitled, all amounts are calculated on a pre-tax basis.	
 	 	
•	Mr. Sperling is compensated in his local currency of Israeli shekels. For purposes of this table, all Israeli shekel amounts for Mr. Sperling have been translated into U.S. dollars using a January 31, 2014 exchange rate of NIS 1=$0.2859.	

43

 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Salary Continuation Value
($)	 	Pro Rata Bonus
($) (3)	 	Additional Bonus
($) (4)	 	Accelerated Equity Awards
($) (5)	 	Health Benefits (present insurance coverage value)
($) (6)	 	Other Benefits
($) (7)	 	280G Tax Gross up
($) (8)	 	Total	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Death	 	—	
 	 	865,327	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	63,407	
 	 	50,225	
 	 	—	
 	 	978,959	
 	
Disability	 	353,640	
 	 	865,327	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	21,136	
 	 	50,225	
 	 	—	
 	 	1,290,328	
 	
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause	 	1,060,950	
 	 	865,327	
 	 	1,224,000	
 	 	15,707,926	
 	 	63,407	
 	 	50,225	
 	 	—	
 	 	18,971,835	
 	
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause in Connection with CIC	 	1,768,230	
 	 	816,000	
 	 	2,040,000	
 	 	15,707,926	
 	 	63,407	
 	 	50,225	
 	 	—	
 	 	20,445,788	
 	
Douglas Robinson	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Death	 	—	
 	 	304,158	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	41,745	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	345,903	
 	
Disability	 	198,492	
 	 	304,158	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	20,873	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	523,523	
 	
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause	 	397,000	
 	 	304,158	
 	 	259,665	
 	 	—	
 	 	41,745	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	1,002,568	
 	
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause in Connection with CIC	 	595,500	
 	 	289,000	
 	 	433,500	
 	 	3,486,202	
 	 	41,745	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	4,845,947	
 	
Elan Moriah	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Death	 	—	
 	 	300,690	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	42,272	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	342,962	
 	
Disability	 	198,500	
 	 	300,690	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	21,136	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	520,326	
 	
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause	 	397,000	
 	 	300,690	
 	 	258,276	
 	 	—	
 	 	42,272	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	998,238	
 	
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause in Connection with CIC	 	595,500	
 	 	289,000	
 	 	433,500	
 	 	4,161,425	
 	 	42,272	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	5,521,697	
 	
Meir Sperling	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Death	 	435,328	
 	(1)	251,909	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	70	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	687,307	
 	
Disability	 	628,808	
 	(1)	251,909	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	70	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	880,787	
 	
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause	 	919,090	
 	(2)	251,909	
 	 	249,540	
 	 	—	
 	 	88	
 	 	28,691	
 	 	—	
 	 	1,449,318	
 	
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause in Connection with CIC	 	1,490,446	
 	(2)	251,909	
 	 	—	
 	 	3,318,347	
 	 	88	
 	 	28,691	
 	 	—	
 	 	5,089,481	
 	
Peter Fante	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Death	 	—	
 	 	234,359	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	42,272	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	276,631	
 	
Disability	 	182,100	
 	 	234,359	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	21,136	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	437,595	
 	
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause	 	364,200	
 	 	234,359	
 	 	214,044	
 	 	—	
 	 	42,272	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	854,875	
 	
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause in Connection with CIC	 	546,300	
 	 	221,000	
 	 	331,500	
 	 	3,070,048	
 	 	42,272	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	4,211,120	
 	
(1) For Mr. Sperling, salary continuation for these events includes a resettlement grant of NIS 1,562,517 ($435,328), and in the case of disability, 6 months of base salary, or NIS 694,452 ($193,479).
(2) For Mr. Sperling, salary continuation for these events includes three months of base salary, or NIS 347,226 ($96,740), during his contractual notice period, a resettlement grant of NIS 1,562,517 ($435,328), and 12 months of base salary, or NIS 1,388,904 ($386,958), for a non-CIC termination, or 18 months of base salary, or NIS 2,083,356 ($580,437), for a CIC termination. The resettlement grant is also payable in the event of Mr. Sperling’s resignation without good reason, but not in the event of a termination for cause.

44

(3) For each officer, in the case of death, disability or resignation for good cause/involuntary termination without cause, the pro-rata bonus reflects the actual bonus awarded for the year ended January 31, 2014 (notwithstanding that the formal determination of bonuses did not occur until after the end of the year). For Mr. Sperling, this amount is NIS 881,110 ($251,909).
For each officer, for a CIC termination, the pro-rata bonus reflects the officer’s target bonus for the year ended January 31, 2014. For Mr. Sperling, this amount is NIS 842,000 ($240,728).
(4) For each officer other than Mr. Bodner, in the case of a non-CIC termination, the additional bonus reflects 100% of the average annual bonus awarded for the three-year period ended January 31, 2014 (notwithstanding that the formal determination of bonuses for the year ended January 31, 2014 did not occur until after the end of the year). For Mr. Sperling, these amounts are NIS 872,823 ($249,540). For Mr. Bodner, in the case of a non-CIC termination, the additional bonus reflects 150% of his target bonus for the year ended January 31, 2014.
For each officer other than Mr. Bodner, for a CIC termination, the additional bonus reflects 150% of the officer’s target bonus for the year ended January 31, 2014. For Mr. Sperling, this amount is NIS 1,263,000 ($361,092). For Mr. Bodner, for a CIC termination, the additional bonus reflects 250% of the target bonus for the year ended January 31, 2014.
(5) For equity awards other than stock options, value is calculated as the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day in the year ended January 31, 2014 ($45.44 on January 31, 2014) times the number of shares accelerating. Shares accelerating includes the target number of performance shares for the January 31, 2014 performance period as well as for performance periods that had not yet been completed as of January 31, 2014. For stock options, value is calculated as the difference between the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day in the year ended January 31, 2014 ($45.44 on January 31, 2014) and the option exercise price per share times the number of stock options accelerating.
(6) For executive officers other than Mr. Sperling, amounts shown represent the actual cost of the contractually agreed number of months of COBRA payments, including applicable income taxes. Mr. Sperling is entitled to continued health benefits during his notice period, and for a period of 12 months following a termination event, the cost of which is considered nominal.
(7) For Mr. Sperling, other benefits include three months of continued contributions to his retirement fund of NIS 19,226 ($5,497), to his severance fund of NIS 28,884 ($8,258), to his study fund of NIS 25,883 ($7,400), disability insurance premiums of NIS 8,595 ($2,457), a statutory recreation payment of NIS 748 ($214), and use of a company car plus a fuel reimbursement allowance costing NIS 17,019 ($4,866) for the period, for a total of NIS 100,355 ($28,691).
(8) The tax reimbursement amount (if any) represents a reasonable estimate of costs to cover the excise tax liability under Internal Revenue Code Section 4999 and the subsequent federal, state and FICA taxes on the reimbursement payment. With respect to tax gross-ups, the assumptions used to calculate this estimate are: an excise tax rate under 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 20%, a federal, state (New York), and FICA tax blended rate of 48.36% (a 40.79% federal income tax rate, a 8.82% state income tax rate, and a 2.35% Medicare tax rate). To the extent applicable, we believe that a covenant not to compete value for the applicable executive officer would be sufficient to offset any “excess parachute payment.”

45

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Director Compensation for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
The following table summarizes the cash and equity compensation earned by each member of the board of directors during the year ended January 31, 2014 for service as a director.

Name	 	Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash	 	Stock
Awards	 	Option
Awards	 	Total	
 	 	(1)	 	(2)	 	(2)	 	 	
Bodner, Dan	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
DeMarines, Victor	 	136,000	
 	(4)	128,688	
 	(5)	—	
 	 	264,688	
 	
Egan, John	 	62,500	
 	 	128,688	
 	(5)	—	
 	 	191,188	
 	
Myers, Larry	 	102,000	
 	(4)	128,688	
 	(5)	—	
 	 	230,688	
 	
Nottenburg, Richard (3)	 	70,000	
 	 	128,688	
 	(5)	—	
 	 	198,688	
 	
Safir, Howard	 	106,000	
 	(4)	128,688	
 	(5)	—	
 	 	234,688	
 	
Shanks, Earl	 	75,000	
 	 	128,688	
 	(5)	—	
 	 	203,688	
 	
(1) Represents amount earned for board of directors service during the year indicated regardless of the year of payment.
(2) Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with applicable accounting standards.
(3) Appointed to the board of directors on February 4, 2013.
(4) On February 4, 2013, we completed the acquisition of CTI, our former parent company, eliminating CTI's majority ownership and control of us. In March 2013, following the closing of the CTI Merger, the board of directors awarded each of Messrs. DeMarines, Myers, and Safir a $25,000 special bonus for their service on the special committee established in connection with the acquisition, in light of the benefits to Verint of ceasing to be a controlled company and the extraordinary effort undertaken by the special committee in reaching this milestone.
(5) On April 19, 2013, each of our independent directors received an award of 3,927 RSUs in respect of service on the board of directors for the year ended January 31, 2014, which vested on April 4, 2014. The grant date fair value of these awards is based on the $32.77 closing price of our common stock on April 19, 2013, however, the number of shares granted was calculated based on the $35.65 closing price of our common stock on March 14, 2013, the date the compensation committee had set in advance to fix the value of these awards.
The following table summarizes the aggregate number of unvested stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units held by each member of our board of directors (granted for service as a director) as of January 31, 2014.

Name	 	Unvested Options	 	Unvested Stock Awards	
 	 	 	 	 	
Bodner, Dan	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
DeMarines, Victor	 	—	
 	 	3,927	
 	
Egan, John	 	—	
 	 	3,927	
 	
Myers, Larry	 	—	
 	 	3,927	
 	
Nottenburg, Richard	 	—	
 	 	3,927	
 	
Safir, Howard	 	—	
 	 	3,927	
 	
Shanks, Earl	 	—	
 	 	3,927	
 	
Non-Independent Directors
From and after the closing of the CTI Merger on February 4, 2013, Mr. Bodner was the only non-independent director on our board of directors during the year ended January 31, 2014. Mr. Bodner has not been separately compensated for his service on

46

the board of directors and no compensation was paid by Verint to any of the non-independent directors who resigned in connection with the closing of the CTI Merger.
Independent Directors
The board of directors is responsible for establishing independent director compensation arrangements based on recommendations from the compensation committee. These compensation arrangements are designed to provide competitive compensation necessary to attract and retain high quality independent directors. The compensation committee annually reviews our independent director compensation arrangements based on market studies or trends and from time to time engages its independent compensation consultant to prepare a customized peer group analysis. On the basis of this review, the compensation committee recommended that our independent director compensation package be left unchanged for the year ended January 31, 2014, except for an increase in the chairmanship fee for the chairman of the board from $25,000 to $40,000, which fee had not been been updated in several years while the board chairmanship was held by a non-independent director designated by CTI and which the board concluded was well below market.
The following summarizes the compensation package for our independent directors for the year ended January 31, 2014:
 	 	
•	An annual equity grant with a value of $140,000, subject to one-year vesting;	
 	 	
•	$50,000 annual cash retainer;	
 	 	
•	No per-meeting fees; and	
 	 	
•	Annual board and committee chairmanship and membership fees as set forth below:	

 	 	 	
 	Committee Membership Fee	Chairmanship Fee
(paid in lieu of membership fee for committee chairman)	
Board of Directors	N/A	$40,000	
Audit Committee	$15,000	$27,000	
Compensation Committee	$10,000	$20,000	
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee	$6,000	$12,500	
On March 21, 2014, the board of directors completed its review of a new director compensation benchmarking study and, following a recommendation from the compensation committee, increased the value of the annual director equity grant from $140,000 to $200,000 and increased the chairmanship fee for the chairman of the board from $40,000 to $60,000 for service during the year ending January 31, 2015, in order to increase the competitiveness of our director compensation package and better align it to the market.
Other Director Compensation Information
All directors are eligible to be reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses in attending meetings of the board of directors or of committees of the board of directors.
Our board of directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers and non-employee directors who are compensated by us for their services. Our directors are also subject to our insider trading policy and an additional policy restricting hedging and pledging transactions. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Ownership Guidelines and Other Policies.”

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
No executive officer has served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive officers who served as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee. None of the members of the compensation committee is or has ever been a Verint officer or employee.

47

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table and accompanying footnotes show information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 30, 2014 (the “Reference Date”) by:
 	 	
•	each person (or group within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) who is known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our common stock as of the Reference Date;	
 	 	
•	each member of our board of directors and each of our named executive officers; and	
 	 	
•	all members of our board of directors and our executive officers as a group.	
As used in this table, “beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote or direct the voting or to dispose or direct the disposition of any equity security.
 	 	
•	A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that he or she has the right to acquire within 60 days from the Reference Date through the exercise of any option, warrant, or right.	
 	 	
•	Shares of our common stock subject to options, warrants, or rights which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of the person holding such options, warrants, or rights, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of any other person.	
 	 	
•	The amounts and percentages are based upon 54,036,901 shares of common stock outstanding as of the Reference Date.	
 	 	
•	The foregoing outstanding share number includes employee equity awards that have been settled but excludes awards that are vested but not yet delivered (if any).	
 	 	
•	The table below, however, includes awards that have vested or will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date even if the underlying shares have not yet been delivered.	

48

 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Name of Beneficial Owner	 	Class	 	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (1)	 	Percentage of Total Shares Outstanding	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Principal Stockholders:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Wellington Management Company, LLP	 	Common	 	7,421,265	
 	(2	)	13.7	%	 	
     280 Congress Street	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
     Boston, MA 02210	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cadian Capital Management, LP	 	Common	 	4,794,529	
 	(3	)	8.9	%	 	
     353 Madison Avenue	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
36th Floor	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
     New York, NY 10022	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
BlackRock, Inc.	 	Common	 	3,393,701	
 	(4	)	6.3	%	 	
     40 East 52nd Street	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
     New York, NY 10022	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
The Vanguard Group, Inc.	 	Common	 	2,946,896	
 	(5	)	5.5	%	 	
     100 Vanguard Boulevard	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
     Malvern, PA 19355	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Directors and Executive Officers:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dan Bodner	 	Common	 	597,407	
 	(6	)	1.1	%	 	
Douglas Robinson	 	Common	 	101,207	
 	(7	)	*	
 	 	
Peter Fante	 	Common	 	21,196	
 	(8	)	*	
 	 	
Elan Moriah	 	Common	 	43,091	
 	(9	)	*	
 	 	
Meir Sperling	 	Common	 	51,464	
 	(10	)	*	
 	 	
Victor DeMarines	 	Common	 	26,059	
 	(11	)	*	
 	 	
John Egan	 	Common	 	6,160	
 	(12	)	*	
 	 	
Larry Myers	 	Common	 	14,956	
 	(13	)	*	
 	 	
Richard Nottenburg	 	Common	 	3,927	
 	(14	)	*	
 	 	
Howard Safir	 	Common	 	8,440	
 	(15	)	*	
 	 	
Earl Shanks	 	Common	 	10,152	
 	(16	)	*	

All executive officers and directors as a group (twelve persons)	 	 	 	884,059	
 	 	1.6	%	 	
* Less than 1%.

(1)	Unless otherwise indicated and except pursuant to applicable community property laws, to our knowledge, each person or entity listed in the table above has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares listed as owned by such person or entity.	
 	 	
(2)	As reported in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 by Wellington Management Company, LLP (“Wellington”), Wellington has shared voting power over 6,341,073 shares of Verint common stock and shared dispositive power over 7,421,265 shares of Verint common stock.	
 	 	
(3)	As reported in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 by Cadian Capital Management, LP ("CCM"), Cadian Master Fund, LP (“CMF”), and Eric Bannasch ("Mr. Bannasch" and, together with CCM and CMF, collectively, the “Cadian Entities”), the Cadian Entities have shared voting and shared dispositive power over shares of Verint common stock as follows: CCM - 4,794,529 shares; CMF - 2,445,210 shares; and Mr. Bannasch - 4,794,529 shares.	
 	 	
(4)	As reported in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 31, 2014 by BlackRock, Inc. ("BlackRock"), BlackRock has sole voting power over 3,242,845 shares of Verint common stock and sole dispositive power over 3,393,701 shares of Verint common stock.

49

 	
 	 	
(5)	As reported in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2014 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. ("Vanguard"), Vanguard has sole voting power over 74,724 shares of Verint common stock, sole dispositive power over 2,875,772 shares of Verint common stock and shared dispositive power over 71,124 shares of Verint common stock.	
 	 	
(6)	Mr. Bodner beneficially owns options to purchase 168,000 shares of Verint common stock which are currently exercisable, 391,962 fully vested shares of Verint common stock, and 37,445 restricted stock units which will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date.	
 	 	
(7)	Mr. Robinson beneficially owns 92,886 fully vested shares of Verint common stock and 8,321 restricted stock units which will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date.

(8)	Mr. Fante beneficially owns 14,348 shares of Verint common stock and 6,848 restricted stock units which will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date.

(9)	Mr. Moriah beneficially owns 34,510 fully vested shares of Verint common stock, and 8,581 restricted stock units which will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date.	
 	 	
(10)	Mr. Sperling beneficially owns options to purchase 14,515 shares of Verint common stock which are currently exercisable, 29,061 fully vested shares of Verint common stock, and 7,888 restricted stock units which will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date.	
 	 	
(11)	Mr. DeMarines beneficially owns options to purchase 6,000 shares of Verint common stock which are currently exercisable and 20,059 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.

(12)	Mr. Egan beneficially owns 6,160 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.

(13)	Mr. Myers beneficially owns options to purchase 6,000 shares of Verint common stock which are currently exercisable and 8,956 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.	
 	 	
(14)	Dr. Nottenburg beneficially owns 3,927 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.

(15)	Mr. Safir beneficially owns 8,440 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.	
 	 	
(16)	Mr. Shanks beneficially owns 10,152 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.

50

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires our directors, executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file initial reports of ownership on Form 3 and reports of changes in ownership on Forms 4 or 5 with the SEC. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders also are required by SEC rules to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
Based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to us, or written representations that no reports were required, we believe that during the year ended January 31, 2014, our directors, executive officers, and 10% stockholders complied with all filing requirements.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
Under our audit committee charter, all related-party transactions (as described in Item 404 of Regulation S-K and relevant SEC and stock exchange rules) other than director and officer compensation arrangements approved by the full board of directors or the compensation committee must be approved in advance by our audit committee. In addition to the requirements of our audit committee charter, we have a written policy regarding the approval of related-party transactions. Such policy provides that any related-party transaction, which includes any financial transaction, arrangement, or relationship between us and a related party, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements, or relationships between us and a related party, where the aggregate amount involved will or is expected to exceed $120,000 in any fiscal year, must be described in writing and submitted to our Chief Compliance Officer prior to the transaction. Such proposed related-party transaction must be reviewed by our Chief Compliance Officer and/or Chief Financial Officer and must be submitted to our audit committee for its review and approval. Our Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and audit committee will consider several factors in their review, including the fairness of the terms of the transaction, the role of the related party in the transaction, and whether the transaction could have an effect on the status of any director or director nominees as an independent director under applicable rules. The audit committee has reviewed and approved all of the agreements and transactions referred to in this section.
The following summarizes various agreements and arrangements that were in effect during the period beginning on February 1, 2013 (the first day of our most recently completed fiscal year) and ending on the date of this proxy statement between us and related parties, principally CTI, our former majority stockholder, and its affiliates.
Agreements Relating to the CTI Merger
On August 12, 2012, we entered into the CTI Merger Agreement providing for the CTI Merger, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the CTI Merger Agreement. The CTI Merger was completed on February 4, 2013.
CTI Merger Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of the CTI Merger Agreement, each share of CTI common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the CTI Merger was converted into the right to receive new shares of our common stock at an exchange ratio of 0.1298 shares of our common stock for each share of CTI common stock. In addition, each outstanding share of our Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share ("Preferred Stock") and each outstanding share of our common stock held by CTI immediately prior to the effective time of the CTI Merger was canceled. Immediately following the effective time of the CTI Merger, former CTI shareholders owned approximately 54.6% of our common stock outstanding after completion of the CTI Merger.
Pursuant to the terms of the CTI Merger Agreement, the completion of the CTI Merger was contingent upon, among other things, CTI's completion of a distribution to its shareholders of substantially all of its assets other than its interest in us (the "Comverse share distribution") or another sale or disposition by CTI of those assets (a "Comverse disposition").
The share exchange provision of the CTI Merger Agreement provided that each holder of shares of CTI common stock would receive new shares of our common stock representing such holder's pro rata portion of an aggregate number of shares of our common stock equal to the sum of (1) the shares of our common stock held by CTI immediately prior to the completion of the CTI Merger (including the shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of the shares of our Preferred Stock held by CTI at a conversion price of $32.66), plus (2) additional shares of our common stock the number of which is equal to the $25 million Target Amount (described below) divided by the average of the daily volume weighted averages of the trading prices of our common stock on NASDAQ during the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the closing date of the CTI Merger, plus (3) additional shares of our common stock based on the positive net worth of CTI (as determined in accordance with the CTI Merger Agreement) immediately prior to the completion of the CTI Merger, up to a maximum dollar value of $10 million.  Under the CTI Merger Agreement, the Target Amount was determined based on the timing of the Comverse share distribution or a Comverse disposition and the level of CTI's beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock following the date of the CTI Merger Agreement.
Under the terms of the CTI Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of our common stock and our Preferred Stock held by CTI at the effective time of the CTI Merger was canceled.  Holders of shares of our common stock immediately prior to the completion of the CTI Merger, other than CTI, continued to own their existing shares, which were not affected by the CTI Merger.
The CTI Merger Agreement restricted CTI from amending or modifying the terms of the agreements relating to the Comverse share distribution from the forms attached to the CTI Merger Agreement without our consent if those amendments or

51

modifications would adversely affect our rights or the rights of CTI under those agreements in any material respect, including without limitation the right of CTI to be indemnified for specified losses related to its former subsidiary, Comverse, Inc. ("Comverse").
The CTI Merger Agreement provided certain termination rights to both us and CTI, including in the event that the Comverse share distribution or a Comverse disposition did not occur by April 30, 2013, and further provided that in connection with the termination of the CTI Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, we may have been required to pay CTI, or CTI may have been required to pay us, a fee of $10 million and/or such party's out-of-pocket expenses.  Furthermore, upon termination of the CTI Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, we and CTI would have been entitled to certain rights and subject to certain obligations set forth in the Governance and Repurchase Rights Agreement, as further described below.
Voting Agreement

In connection with entering into the CTI Merger Agreement, CTI entered into a Voting Agreement (the "Voting Agreement") with us pursuant to which CTI agreed, among other things, to vote the shares of our common stock and our Preferred Stock beneficially owned by CTI in favor of the adoption of the CTI Merger Agreement.  CTI also agreed to comply with certain restrictions on the disposition of such shares as set forth in the Voting Agreement, including requiring any transferee of CTI's voting securities to be bound by the terms of the Voting Agreement.  Pursuant to its terms, the Voting Agreement terminated upon the completion of the CTI Merger. 
Governance and Repurchase Rights Agreement

Also in connection with entering into the CTI Merger Agreement, we and CTI entered into a Governance and Repurchase Rights Agreement (the "Governance and Repurchase Rights Agreement").
The Governance and Repurchase Rights Agreement set forth certain agreements between the parties regarding the size and composition of our board of directors in the event the CTI Merger Agreement was terminated either (i) because the Comverse share distribution or a Comverse disposition failed to occur by April 30, 2013 (but only if CTI shareholder approval for the Comverse share distribution or Comverse disposition was obtained) or (ii) as a result of a knowing or deliberate breach by CTI of its obligations under the CTI Merger Agreement that was not cured within 30 days of notice ("Trigger Events").
In addition, CTI agreed that following a Trigger Event and in the circumstances set forth in the Governance and Repurchase Rights Agreement, neither CTI nor its affiliates would, directly or indirectly, acquire or propose to acquire beneficial ownership of any of our outstanding voting securities other than shares of our common stock acquired pursuant to the conversion of our Preferred Stock beneficially owned by CTI (the "Standstill").
CTI also agreed that following a Trigger Event and in the circumstances set forth in the Governance and Repurchase Rights Agreement, it would vote its shares of our common stock and Preferred Stock in proportion to the votes cast with respect to our voting securities that were not beneficially owned by CTI, with specified exceptions.
In addition, CTI granted us the right following a Trigger Event and in the circumstances set forth in the Governance and Repurchase Rights Agreement to purchase such number of shares (the "Option Shares") of our Preferred Stock owned by CTI (or our common stock into which such Preferred Stock had been converted) that would result in CTI having beneficial ownership of our voting securities of less than 50% but not less than 49.5% (on an as-exercised and fully diluted basis). 
We also granted CTI the right to cause us to purchase the Option Shares in the event the CTI Merger Agreement was terminated because the Comverse share distribution or a Comverse disposition failed to occur by April 30, 2013 (but only if CTI shareholder approval for the Comverse share distribution or a Comverse disposition was obtained). 
Each option would automatically terminate in the event CTI beneficially owned less than 50% of our outstanding voting securities (on an as-exercised and fully diluted basis) unless an option had been exercised but not consummated in accordance with the terms of the Governance and Repurchase Rights Agreement, in which case the termination date would have been extended until the consummation of the option.  If CTI were to have properly exercised its put option but we failed to consummate that option, CTI's sole remedy would have been the forfeiture of our call option and the termination of the Standstill.
Pursuant to its terms, the Governance and Repurchase Rights Agreement terminated upon the completion of the CTI Merger. 

52

Comverse Share Distribution

On October 31, 2012, CTI completed the Comverse share distribution in which it distributed all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Comverse to CTI's shareholders. As a result of the Comverse share distribution, Comverse became an independent publicly held company and ceased to be a wholly owned subsidiary of CTI.
Distribution Agreement

In connection with the Comverse share distribution, Comverse and CTI entered into a Distribution Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012 (the "Distribution Agreement"). We were a third-party beneficiary of that agreement and assumed CTI's rights and obligations under that agreement in connection with the CTI Merger. The Distribution Agreement sets forth the agreement between CTI and Comverse regarding the principal transactions necessary to separate Comverse from CTI. It also sets forth other agreements that govern certain aspects of CTI's relationship with Comverse following the completion of the Comverse share distribution and provides certain indemnities to CTI and its affiliates (including us) related to the CTI Merger Agreement, the Comverse share distribution and the Comverse business.
Distribution. Under the terms of the Distribution Agreement, on October 31, 2012, CTI distributed to its shareholders one share of Comverse common stock for every ten shares of CTI common stock held by its shareholders. Fractional shares were aggregated and sold in the public market by the distribution agent at prevailing market prices, with the net proceeds distributed to each of the holders that were otherwise entitled to receive the fractional shares.
Transfer of Assets and Assumptions of Liabilities. The Distribution Agreement identified certain transfers of assets and assumptions of liabilities that were necessary in advance of the Comverse share distribution so that each of CTI and Comverse retained the assets of, and the liabilities associated with, their respective businesses. The Distribution Agreement also provided for the settlement or extinguishment of certain liabilities and other obligations between CTI and Comverse as well as procedures for the conveyance to the proper party of assets or liabilities that were initially misallocated.
Release of Claims. Comverse agreed to broad releases pursuant to which it released CTI and its affiliates, successors and assigns from, and indemnified and held harmless all such persons against and from, any claims against any of them arising out of or relating to the management of Comverse's business, certain events that took place prior to the Comverse share distribution, the Comverse share distribution, the terms of the Distribution Agreement and the other agreements entered into in connection with the Comverse share distribution, Comverse's post-share distribution certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and any other decision made or action taken relating to Comverse. The releases did not extend to obligations or liabilities under any agreements between CTI and Comverse that remained in effect following the Comverse share distribution.
Exchange of Information. CTI and Comverse agreed to provide each other with information relating to the other party or the conduct of its business prior to the Comverse share distribution, and information reasonably necessary to prepare financial statements and any reports or filings to be made with any governmental authority. CTI and Comverse also agreed to retain such information in accordance with their respective record retention policies as in effect on the date of the Distribution Agreement or as otherwise required by law or agreement.
Access to Information; Witnesses; Confidentiality. CTI and Comverse each agreed to allow the other party and its representatives reasonable access to all records in its possession relating to the business and affairs of the other party, including for audit, accounting, litigation, income taxes, financial reporting and regulatory compliance purposes. CTI and Comverse also agreed to use reasonable efforts to make available to the other party and its accountants, counsel and other designated representatives, upon written request, its directors, officers, employees and representatives as witnesses and to otherwise cooperate with the other party in connection with any proceeding arising out of its or the other party's business and operation before the Comverse share distribution. Subject to limited exceptions, each party agreed to hold confidential all information in its or their possession concerning the other party.
Indemnification. CTI and Comverse agreed to indemnify each other and each of their respective affiliates and representatives, and each of the heirs, executors, successors and assigns of such representatives, against certain liabilities in connection with their respective businesses and any breach by such party of the Distribution Agreement.
In addition, under the Distribution Agreement, Comverse agreed to indemnify CTI and its affiliates (including us) against certain losses that may arise as a result of the CTI Merger and the Comverse share distribution. Certain of these indemnification obligations are capped at $25.0 million and certain are uncapped. Specifically, the capped indemnification obligations include indemnifying us against losses stemming from breaches by CTI of representations, warranties and covenants in the CTI Merger Agreement and for any liabilities of CTI that were known by CTI but not included on the net

53

worth statement delivered at the closing of the CTI Merger. Comverse's uncapped indemnification obligations include indemnifying us against liabilities relating to Comverse's business; claims by any shareholder or creditor of CTI related to the Comverse share distribution, the CTI Merger or related transactions or disclosure documents; certain claims made by employees or former employees of CTI and any claims made by employees and former employees of Comverse; any failure by Comverse to perform under any of the agreements entered into in connection with the Comverse share distribution; claims related to CTI's ownership or operation of Comverse; claims related to the disposition of CTI's ownership interest in Starhome B.V.; certain retained liabilities of CTI that were not reflected on or reserved against on the net worth statement delivered by CTI at the closing of the CTI Merger; and claims arising out of the exercise of appraisal rights by a CTI shareholder in connection with the Comverse share distribution. CTI agreed to place $25.0 million in cash in escrow at the completion of the CTI Merger to support certain indemnification claims to the extent made against Comverse by us. Any amounts remaining in the escrow account at the 18 month anniversary of the closing of the CTI Merger (excluding amounts set aside for existing liability claims) will be released to Comverse. Comverse also assumed all pre-Comverse share distribution tax obligations of each of Comverse and CTI.
Additional Agreements

In order to govern certain ongoing relationships between CTI and Comverse after the Comverse share distribution and to provide mechanisms for an orderly transition, CTI and Comverse entered into agreements pursuant to which certain services and rights will be provided for following the Comverse share distribution, and CTI and Comverse will indemnify each other against certain liabilities arising from their respective businesses, the services that will be provided under such agreement and the Comverse share distribution. While management does not believe any of these agreements are of the type required to be described under Item 404 of Regulation S-K and relevant SEC and stock exchange rules, we assumed CTI's rights and obligations under these agreement following the CTI Merger. The following is a summary of the terms of these agreements.
Tax Disaffiliation Agreement. In connection with the Comverse share distribution, Comverse and CTI entered into a Tax Disaffiliation Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012 (the "Tax Disaffiliation Agreement"). The Tax Disaffiliation Agreement governs CTI's and Comverse's respective rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to both pre- and post-Comverse share distribution periods, including tax liabilities and benefits, the preparation and filing of tax returns, and the control of audits and other tax matters. CTI and Comverse entered into the Tax Disaffiliation Agreement effective as of the effective date of the Comverse share distribution. In general, Comverse is required under the Tax Disaffiliation Agreement to pay (a) all CTI pre-disposition group taxes attributable to periods ending on or before the date of the Comverse share distribution and the portion of any straddle period ending on the date of the Comverse share distribution, and (b) all Comverse group taxes attributable to periods beginning on the day after the date of the Comverse share distribution and the portion of any straddle period beginning on the day after the date of the Comverse share distribution. In general, CTI is required under the Tax Disaffiliation Agreement to pay all CTI group taxes attributable to periods beginning on the day after the date of the Comverse share distribution and the portion of any straddle period beginning on the day after the date of the Comverse share distribution. Comverse's obligations under the Tax Disaffiliation Agreement are not limited in amount or subject to any cap. The Tax Disaffiliation Agreement also contains obligations for each of CTI and Comverse to indemnify the other for breaches of its obligations under such agreement, including in respect of payment of taxes for which it is responsible.
Transition Services Agreement. In connection with the Comverse share distribution, Comverse and CTI entered into a Transition Services Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012 (the "Transition Services Agreement"), pursuant to which each of CTI and Comverse agreed to provide the other with certain services to help ensure an orderly transition following the Comverse share distribution.
The services to be provided by Comverse to CTI under the Transition Services Agreement include: payroll services; health and welfare plan administration; finance, treasury, accounting and internal audit services; tax return preparation; financial reporting; insurance services; information technology services; and other operation support and services. In addition, CTI is permitted to request that Comverse provide it with certain services not contemplated by the Transition Services Agreement, to the extent the request is made in good faith and the terms and conditions of such additional services are agreed. Under the Transition Services Agreement, CTI agreed to provide Comverse with the type of general operational support historically provided to Comverse by CTI employees, in each case limited to providing executive oversight, granting approvals and performing other duties required for filings.
Amounts payable for services provided under the Transition Services Agreement will generally equal the costs and expenses incurred by the party providing the services, and a significant portion of the services that Comverse is to provide have fixed fees. The Transition Services Agreement requires that the services be provided in a manner to permit CTI to comply with its legal obligations and in a manner and at a level of service that is consistent with past practice for the parties and in any event with at least a reasonable degree of care.

54

Subject to limited exceptions, each of CTI and Comverse agreed to limit their liability to the other in respect of causes of action arising under the agreement. In addition, Comverse agreed to indemnify CTI against certain losses stemming from the provision of services and certain breaches of the agreement.
The Transition Services Agreement will continue in effect until terminated in accordance with its terms. Each party has the right to terminate the services provided to it under the Transition Services Agreement upon thirty days prior written notice. In addition, CTI can terminate the agreement upon five days prior written notice upon the occurrence of certain corporate events.
Employee Matters Agreement. Also in connection with the Comverse share distribution, Comverse and CTI entered into an Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012 (the "Employee Matters Agreement"). The Employee Matters Agreement allocates liabilities and responsibilities between CTI and Comverse relating to employee compensation and benefit plans and programs, including the treatment of certain employment agreements, severance plans, outstanding annual and long-term incentive awards, and health and welfare benefit obligations.
In general, the Employee Matters Agreement provides that, following the Comverse share distribution, Comverse will be responsible for all employment and benefit-related obligations and liabilities related to those individuals employed by Comverse prior to the Comverse share distribution and those individuals whose employment were transferred to Comverse in connection with the Comverse share distribution. In general, CTI will be responsible for any employment and benefit-related obligations and liabilities of any employees who continued to be employees of CTI following the Comverse share distribution.
Historical CTI Agreements

The following summarizes various agreements between us and CTI, our former parent company, and its affiliates, that were in effect for any period of time during the year ended January 31, 2014. Under the terms of the CTI Merger Agreement, on February 4, 2013, CTI merged with and into our new, wholly owned subsidiary, with our subsidiary continuing as the surviving entity, and all of the shares of our Preferred Stock outstanding at the effective time of the CTI Merger were canceled. As a result, each of the agreements described below, other than the Federal Income Tax Sharing Agreement, are no longer in effect as of the filing date of this report.
Federal Income Tax Sharing Agreement
We are party to a tax sharing agreement with CTI which applies to periods prior to our IPO in which we were included in CTI's consolidated federal tax return. Under this agreement, for periods during which we were included in CTI's consolidated tax return, we were required to pay CTI an amount equal to the tax liability we would have owed, if any, had we filed a federal tax return on our own, as computed by CTI in its reasonable discretion. Under this agreement, we were not entitled to receive any payments from CTI in respect of, or to otherwise take advantage of, any loss resulting from the calculation of our separate tax liability. The tax sharing agreement also provided for certain payments in the event of adjustments to the group's tax liability. The tax sharing agreement will continue in effect until 60 days after the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations for the final year in which we were part of the CTI consolidated group for tax purposes.
Preferred Stock Financing Agreements
On May 25, 2007 (the "Issue Date"), we issued 293,000 shares of our Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share ("Preferred Stock'), to CTI in connection with our acquisition of Witness Systems Inc.
The Preferred Stock was issued at a purchase price of $1,000 per share and ranked senior to our common stock. The Preferred Stock had an initial liquidation preference equal to the purchase price of the Preferred Stock, or $1,000 per share. In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up of us, the holders of the Preferred Stock would have been entitled to receive, out of the assets available for distribution to our stockholders and before any distribution of assets is made on holders of our common stock, an amount equal to the then-current liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends.
Cash dividends on the Preferred Stock were cumulative and accrued quarterly at a specified dividend rate on the liquidation preference in effect at such time. Initially, the specified dividend rate was 4.25% per annum per share; however, in accordance with the terms of the certificate of designation for the Preferred Stock, beginning with the quarter ended January 31, 2008, the dividend rate was reset to 3.875% per annum and was fixed at that level. If we were to have determined that we were prohibited from paying cash dividends on the Preferred Stock under the terms of our credit agreement or other debt instruments, we were permitted to elect to make such dividend payments in shares of our common stock, which common stock would have been valued at 95% of the volume weighted-average price of our common stock for each of the five consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the record date for such dividend.

55

Each share of Preferred Stock was entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of shares of our common stock into which such share of Preferred Stock was convertible at the conversion rate in effect on the Issue Date, or 30.6185 shares of our common stock for each share of Preferred Stock. In addition, each share of Preferred Stock was convertible, at the option of the holder, into a number of shares of our common stock equal to the liquidation preference then in effect divided by the conversion price then in effect, which was initially set at $32.66 (as adjusted from time to time, the "Conversion Rate"). We also had the right in certain circumstances to cause the mandatory conversion of the Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock at the then-applicable Conversion Rate.
Beginning with the second anniversary of the Issue Date (May 25, 2009), we had the right to force the conversion of all, but not less than all, of the Preferred Stock into our common stock at our option, but only if the closing sale price of our common stock immediately prior to such conversion equaled or exceeded the conversion price then in effect by a specified percentage. From and after the fourth anniversary of the Issue Date (May 25, 2011), this percentage was fixed at 135%.
The terms of the Preferred Stock also provided that upon a fundamental change, as defined in the certificate of designation for the Preferred Stock, the holders of the Preferred Stock would have had the right to require us to repurchase the Preferred Stock for 100% of the liquidation preference then in effect. If we failed to repurchase the Preferred Stock as required upon a fundamental change, then the number of directors constituting our board of directors would have been increased by two, and the holders of the Preferred Stock would have had the right to elect two directors to fill such vacancies. Upon repurchase of the Preferred Stock subject to the fundamental change repurchase right, the holders of the Preferred Stock would no longer have the right to elect such additional directors, the term of office of each such additional director would terminate immediately upon such repurchase, and the number of directors would, without further action, be reduced by two. In addition, in the event of a fundamental change, the Conversion Rate would have been increased to provide for additional shares of our common stock issuable to the holders of the Preferred Stock upon conversion, based on a sliding scale depending on the acquisition price, as defined in the certificate of designation for the Preferred Stock, ranging from zero to 3.7 additional shares of our common stock for every share of Preferred Stock converted into our common stock following a fundamental change.
CTI had the right to sell the Preferred Stock beginning on November 25, 2007 in either private or public transactions. Pursuant to a Registration Rights Agreement we entered into on the Issue Date (the "New Registration Rights Agreement"), commencing 180 days after we regained compliance with SEC reporting requirements, CTI was entitled to two demands to require us to register the Preferred Stock and/or the shares of our common stock underlying the Preferred Stock for resale under the Securities Act. The New Registration Rights Agreement also gave CTI unlimited piggyback registration rights on certain Securities Act registrations filed by us on our own behalf or on behalf of other stockholders.
We agreed to pay all expenses resulting from a registration under the New Registration Rights Agreement, other than underwriting commissions and taxes. We also agreed to indemnify CTI, its directors, officers and employees against liabilities arising from sales of shares registered pursuant to the New Registration Rights Agreement, including Securities Act liabilities.
CTI Original Registration Rights Agreement
CTI's rights under the New Registration Rights Agreement were in addition to its rights under a previous Registration Rights Agreement we entered into with CTI shortly before our IPO in May 2002. This registration rights agreement (the "Original Registration Rights Agreement") covered all shares of our common stock then held by CTI and any additional shares of our common stock acquired by CTI at a later date. Under the Original Registration Rights Agreement, CTI was entitled to unlimited demand registrations of its shares on Form S-3. If we were not eligible to use Form S-3, CTI was also entitled to one demand registration on Form S-1.
CTI exercised its one Form S-1 demand registration right under the Original Registration Rights Agreement in July 2010, demanding that we prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 to permit the public offering and sale of up to 2.8 million shares of our common stock owned by CTI. In connection with the exercise of this demand, we entered into a letter agreement with CTI pursuant to which we agreed not to exercise our rights under the Original Registration Rights Agreement to delay the filing of, or offer shares pursuant to, the prospectus, subject to certain limitations. CTI subsequently reduced the size of the offering to 2.3 million shares. A registration statement relating to these securities was declared effective by the SEC in January 2011.
Like the New Registration Rights Agreement, the Original Registration Rights Agreement also provided CTI with unlimited piggyback registration rights, required us to pay all expenses of a registration under the agreement (other than underwriting commissions and taxes), required us to indemnify CTI and its affiliates from liabilities resulting from the sale of our common stock under the agreement.

56

AUDIT MATTERS
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Procedures
The audit committee of our board of directors is directly responsible for the appointment, oversight, and evaluation of our independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with the audit committee’s charter, it must approve, in advance of the service, all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and establish policies and procedures for the engagement of the outside auditor to provide audit and permissible non-audit services. Our independent registered public accounting firm may not be retained to perform non-audit services specified in Section 10A(g) of the Exchange Act.
The committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report any pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its next scheduled meeting.
The audit committee appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as our auditors for the years ended January 31, 2014 and 2013. Deloitte & Touche LLP has advised the audit committee that they are independent accountants with respect to Verint, within the meaning of standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Independence Standards Board and federal securities laws administered by the SEC.
In conjunction with our management, the audit committee regularly reviews the services and fees from our independent registered public accounting firm. Our audit committee has determined that the providing of certain non-audit services, as described below, is compatible with maintaining the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
In addition to performing the audit of our consolidated financial statements, Deloitte & Touche LLP provided various other services during the years ended January 31, 2014 and 2013. Our audit committee has determined that these services did not impair Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence from Verint.
Fees of Independent Registered Public Accountants
During the years ended January 31, 2014 and 2013, we retained Deloitte & Touche LLP to provide professional services in the following categories and amounts:

 	 	Year Ended January 31,	
(in thousands)	 	2014	 	2013	
Audit fees (1)	 	$	4,547	
 	 	$	5,924	
 	
Audit-related fees (2)	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
Tax fees (3)	 	113	
 	 	—	
 	
All other fees (4)	 	—	
 	 	—	
 	
Total fees	 	$	4,660	
 	 	$	5,924	
 	
(1) “Audit fees” include fees for audit services principally related to the year-end examination and the quarterly reviews of our consolidated financial statements, consultation on matters that arise during a review or audit, review of SEC filings, audit services performed in connection with our acquisitions, and statutory audit fees.
(2) “Audit-related fees” include fees which are for assurance and related services other than those included in Audit fees.
(3) “Tax fees” include fees for tax compliance and advice.
(4) “All other fees” include fees for all other non-audit services.

57

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Role of the Audit Committee
The primary purpose of the audit committee is to assist the board of directors in its general oversight of Verint’s financial reporting process, including its internal controls and audit functions, as well as oversight of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers and the Code of Conduct for all employees. The responsibilities of the audit committee are more fully described in its charter, which can be found on our website at http://www.verint.com/About/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-policies . One of the audit committee’s key responsibilities, as reflected in its charter, is to select, compensate, evaluate, and, when appropriate, replace Verint’s independent registered public accounting firm. The audit committee has the authority to engage its own outside advisers, including experts in particular areas of accounting, as it determines appropriate, apart from counsel or advisers hired by management.
Review of Verint’s Audited Financial Statements for the Year Ended January 31, 2014
Management is primarily responsible for the preparation, presentation, and integrity of Verint’s financial statements. The audit committee reviews Verint’s financial statements on a quarterly and annual basis, and in connection with these reviews, it discusses Verint’s financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The audit committee has reviewed Verint’s audited financial statements for the year ended January 31, 2014 and discussed them with management. In March 2014, the audit committee reviewed Verint’s audited financial statements and footnotes for inclusion in Verint’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014. Based on this review and prior discussions with management and the independent registered public accountants as described below, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that Verint’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014 for filing with the SEC.
Review and Discussions with the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Verint’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements of Verint, and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. Deloitte & Touche LLP is also responsible for performing a review of Verint’s quarterly financial results, which are published in our earnings releases and Forms 10-Q.
The audit committee has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards (“SAS”) No. 61, as amended by SAS No. 89, SAS No. 90 and Rule 2-07 of Regulation S-X regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s judgments about the quality of Verint’s accounting principles as applied in its financial reporting. The audit committee has also received written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its independence, including considering whether the independent registered public accounting firm’s provision of non-audit services to Verint is compatible with the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence.
The audit committee discussed with Verint’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for its audit. The audit committee met with the independent registered public accounting firm to discuss the results of its examinations, the evaluations of Verint’s internal controls, and the overall quality of Verint’s financial reporting. The audit committee also met in private sessions with the independent registered public accounting firm at certain of its meetings, without management present, to discuss financial management, accounting, and internal control issues.

 	Audit Committee:	
 	 	
 	Larry Myers, Chair	
 	Victor DeMarines	
 	Howard Safir	
 	Earl Shanks	

58

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2015 ANNUAL MEETING
Proposals which stockholders desire to have included in our proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting, pursuant to Exchange Act Regulation 14a-8, must be addressed to our Corporate Secretary and received by us not later than the close of business on January 14, 2015. Such proposals must be addressed to Verint Systems Inc., at 330 South Service Road, Melville, New York 11747, and should be submitted to the attention of our Corporate Secretary by certified mail, return receipt requested. SEC rules establish a different deadline for submission of stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in our proxy statement with respect to discretionary voting. The deadline for these proposals for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is March 30, 2015. Our proxy related to the 2015 Annual Meeting may give discretionary authority to the proxy holders to vote with respect to all such proposals received by us. The requirements found in our Amended and Restated By-laws are separate from and in addition to the requirements of the SEC that a stockholder must meet to have a proposal included in our proxy statement.
In accordance with our Amended and Restated By-laws, any stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors at the Annual Meeting may nominate persons for election as directors at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders only if our Corporate Secretary receives written notice of any such nominations no earlier than February 26, 2015 and no later than March 28, 2015. Any stockholder notice of intention to nominate a director shall include:
 	 	
•	as to the nominee:	
 	 	
•	the name, age, business address and residential address of such person;	
 	 	
•	the principal occupation or employment of such person;	
 	 	
•	the class, series and number of our securities that are owned of record or beneficially by such person;	
 	 	
•	the date or dates the securities were acquired and the investment intent of each acquisition;	
 	 	
•	any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (or any comparable successor rule or regulation);	
 	 	
•	any other information relating to such person that the board of directors or any nominating committee of the board of directors reviews in considering any person for nomination as a director, as will be provided by our Corporate Secretary upon request; and	
 	 	
•	as to the stockholder giving the notice and any Stockholder Associate (as such term is defined below):	
 	 	
•	the name and address of the stockholder, as they appear on our stock ledger, and, if different, the current name and address of the stockholder, and the name and address of any Stockholder Associate;	
 	 	
•	a representation that at least one of these persons is a holder of record or beneficially of our securities entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to remain so through the date of the meeting and to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the stockholder’s notice;	
 	 	
•	the class, series and number of our securities that are owned of record or beneficially by each of these persons as of the date of the stockholder’s notice;	
 	 	
•	a description of any material relationships, including legal, financial and/or compensatory, among the stockholder giving the notice, any Stockholder Associate and the proposed nominee(s);	
 	 	
•	a description of any derivative positions related to any class or series of our securities owned of record or beneficially by the stockholder or any Stockholder Associate;	
 	 	
•	a description of whether and the extent to which any hedging, swap or other transaction or series of transactions has been entered into by or on behalf of, or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any short position or any borrowing or lending of securities) has been made, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, or manage risk of stock price changes for, or to increase the voting power of, the stockholder or any Stockholder Associate with respect to any of our securities; and	
 	 	
•	a representation that after the date of the stockholder’s notice and until the date of the annual meeting each of these persons will provide written notice to our Corporate Secretary as soon as practicable following a change in the number of our securities held as described immediately above that equals 1% or more of our then-outstanding shares, and/or entry, termination, amendment or modification of the agreements, arrangements or understanding described immediately above that results in a change that equals 1% or more of our then-outstanding shares or in the economic interests underlying these agreements, arrangements or understanding;	

59

 	 	
•	a representation as to whether the stockholder giving notice and any Stockholder Associate intends, or intends to be part of a group that intends: (A) to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to stockholders; and/or (B) otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of the proposed nominee; and	
 	 	
•	a written consent of each proposed nominee to serve as a director of Verint, if elected, and a representation that the proposed nominee (A) does not or will not have any undisclosed voting commitments or other arrangements with respect to his or her actions as a director; and (B) will comply with our By-laws and all of our applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines.	
For purposes of the notice, a “Stockholder Associate” of any stockholder means (1) any person controlling, directly or indirectly, or acting in concert with, the stockholder; (2) any beneficial owner of securities of Verint owned of record or beneficially by the stockholder; and (3) any person controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Stockholder Associate.
At the request of the board of directors, any person nominated by the board of directors for election as a director must furnish to our Corporate Secretary that information required to be set forth in a stockholder’s notice of nomination which pertains to the nominee or such other information as it may reasonably require to determine the eligibility of such nominee to serve as a director.
However, if the number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting is increased and we do not make a public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size of the board of directors by at least February 3, 2015, then a stockholder’s notice will be considered timely with respect to nominees for the new positions created by the increase if it is received by our Corporate Secretary no later than the close of business on the tenth calendar day after we make such public announcement.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
We will bear the costs of soliciting proxies from our stockholders. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by our directors, officers, and employees by personal interview or telephone. Such directors, officers, and employees will not be additionally compensated for such solicitation, but may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such solicitation. Arrangements will also be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of common stock held of record by such persons, and we may reimburse such brokerage houses, custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such solicitation.

ANNUAL REPORT
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014, was filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014, and such Form 10-K is being sent to stockholders or made available via the Internet on or about May 14, 2014. Stockholders are referred to that report for financial and other information about us. A copy of that report can be obtained, free of charge, by submitting a written request to Verint Systems Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, 330 South Service Road, Melville, New York 11747. That report is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and is not to be deemed a part of the proxy soliciting material.

 	By Order of the Board of Directors,	
 	 	
 	Jonathan Kohl	
 	Corporate Secretary	
Melville, New York
May 14, 2014

60

APPENDIX A

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") section of this proxy statement contains non-GAAP financial measures. The tables below reconcile the non-GAAP financial measures in the CD&A to the most directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP").

The presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation from, as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. In addition, non-GAAP financial measures have limitations in that they do not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP.

 	 	 	 	 	
 (in thousands)	 	Year Ended January 31, 2014	
 	 	 	
Table of Reconciliation from GAAP Revenue to Non-GAAP Revenue	 	 	
 	 	 	
GAAP Revenue	 	$	907,292	
 	
Revenue adjustments related to acquisitions	 	2,729	
 	
Non-GAAP Revenue	 	$	910,021	

Table of Reconciliation from GAAP Operating Income to Non-GAAP Operating Income	 	 	
 	 	 	
GAAP operating income	 	$	122,286	
 	
Revenue adjustments related to acquisitions	 	2,729	
 	
Amortization of acquired technology and backlog	 	12,269	
 	
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets	 	24,662	
 	
Stock-based compensation expenses	 	34,991	
 	
M&A and other adjustments	 	13,036	
 	
Non-GAAP operating income	 	$	209,973	

61

DIRECTIONS TO 2014 ANNUAL MEETING LOCATION
Hilton Garden Inn
1575 Round Swamp Road, Plainview, New York, USA 11803
Tel: 1-516-755-5552 Fax: 1-516-755-5592

Traveling from the East:
Take the Long Island Expressway (I-495) to Round Swamp Road (Exit 48). Proceed down the exit ramp to traffic light. Turn left onto Round Swamp Road and continue under the expressway to the traffic light. Continue straight after light. The hotel entrance is the second left.
Traveling from the West:
Take the Long Island Expressway (I-495) to Round Swamp Road (Exit 48). Proceed down the exit ramp to traffic light. Turn right onto Round Swamp Road. The hotel entrance is the second left.

62

FORM OF PROXY CARD